Suppr超能文献

C2的放射学分析以预测椎弓根螺钉的安全置入

Radiologic Analysis of C2 to Predict Safe Placement of Pedicle Screws.

作者信息

Marco Rex A W, Phelps Christopher I, Kuo Rebecca C, Zhuge W U, Howard Clinton W, Kushwaha Vivek P, Bernstein Derek T

机构信息

Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston, Texas.

University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar 30;12(1):30-36. doi: 10.14444/5006. eCollection 2018 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative assessment of C2 pedicle morphology is critical to safe pedicle screw placement. To avoid iatrogenic injury, complex digital templating software has been introduced; however, this technology may not be available in many centers. We report a technique for preoperative assessment of C2 pedicle screw placement safety based upon 2-dimensional sagittal computed tomography (CT) scan images and verify its utility in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 46 consecutive patients underwent cervical spine CT scans between 2005 and 2011. The C2 pedicle morphology was assessed on sagittal CT imaging by 5 independent reviewers to determine the feasibility and risk associated with pedicle screw placement. Thirty consecutive patients underwent C2 pedicle screw placement and were followed clinically for a minimum of 2 years. The ability to place a screw was noted, and accuracy of screw placement was assessed postoperatively by CT scan.

RESULTS

The CT scan analysis demonstrated that 11% (5/46) of patients had sufficient pedicle size bilaterally to allow safe placement of long pedicle screws with a low risk of vertebral artery injury, whereas 15% (7/46) were considered a high risk bilaterally. Screw placement was deemed low risk in 28%, moderate risk in 38%, and high risk in 34%. Excellent intraobserver reliability and good interobserver reliability was observed. Clinically, 18 of 20 (90%) low-risk and 21 of 24 (88%) moderate-risk pedicle screws were placed safely versus 5 of 16 (31%) high-risk pedicle screws ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the described technique for evaluating the C2 pedicle via sagittal CT scan images allows for safe and reliable pedicle screw placement without relying upon complex digital templating software, which may have limited availability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study aids in the surgical decision-making behind the placement of C2 pedicle screws using CT scans without reliance upon complex digital templating software.

摘要

背景

术前评估C2椎弓根形态对于安全置入椎弓根螺钉至关重要。为避免医源性损伤,已引入复杂的数字模板软件;然而,许多中心可能无法使用该技术。我们报告一种基于二维矢状面计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描图像术前评估C2椎弓根螺钉置入安全性的技术,并在临床实践中验证其效用。

方法

2005年至2011年间,共有46例连续患者接受了颈椎CT扫描。5名独立评估者在矢状面CT成像上评估C2椎弓根形态,以确定与椎弓根螺钉置入相关的可行性和风险。30例连续患者接受了C2椎弓根螺钉置入,并进行了至少2年的临床随访。记录螺钉置入能力,并术后通过CT扫描评估螺钉置入的准确性。

结果

CT扫描分析表明,11%(5/46)的患者双侧椎弓根尺寸足够,可安全置入长椎弓根螺钉,椎动脉损伤风险低,而15%(7/46)的患者双侧被认为风险高。螺钉置入被认为低风险的占28%,中等风险的占38%,高风险的占34%。观察到观察者内可靠性极佳,观察者间可靠性良好。临床上,20例低风险椎弓根螺钉中有18例(90%)、24例中等风险椎弓根螺钉中有21例(88%)安全置入,而16例高风险椎弓根螺钉中只有5例(31%)安全置入(P<0.001)。

结论

使用所描述的通过矢状面CT扫描图像评估C2椎弓根的技术,无需依赖可能可用性有限的复杂数字模板软件,即可安全可靠地置入椎弓根螺钉。

证据级别

II。

临床相关性

本研究有助于在不依赖复杂数字模板软件的情况下,利用CT扫描进行C2椎弓根螺钉置入的手术决策。

相似文献

1
Radiologic Analysis of C2 to Predict Safe Placement of Pedicle Screws.
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar 30;12(1):30-36. doi: 10.14444/5006. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1-C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):775-85. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 14.
4
Safety and accuracy of freehand versus navigated C2 pars or pedicle screw placement.
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Preoperative radiographic factors and surgeon experience are associated with cortical breach of C2 pedicle screws.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb;23(1):9-14. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318194e746.
8
Freehand technique for C2 pedicle and pars screw placement: is it safe?
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1197-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Value of intraoperative true lateral radiograph of C2 pedicle for C1-2 transarticular screw insertion.
Spine J. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.009.
10
Freehand C2 Pedicle Screw Placement: Surgical Anatomy and Operative Technique.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;132:113. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.198. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing parsicle screws as a viable alternative to pars screws and pedicle screws for C2 posterior instrumentation fixation.
J Orthop. 2021 May 15;25:220-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.024. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
2
A biomechanical comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations in atlantoaxial internal fixation.
Eur Spine J. 2021 Feb;30(2):576-584. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06655-6. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01798-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Computed tomography-based classification of axis vertebra: choice of screw placement.
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1084-91. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3240-z. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
2
C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):371-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318193a21b.
3
A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2415-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818916e3.
4
Techniques of posterior C1-C2 stabilization.
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jan;60(1 Supp1 1):S103-11. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249220.50085.E4.
6
A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):E636-40. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184750.80067.a1.
7
Anatomic suitability of the C1-C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1494-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00003.
8
Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 15;26(22):2467-71. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00014.
9
Morphologic considerations of C2 isthmus dimensions for the placement of transarticular screws.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 15;25(12):1542-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00014.
10
Peroperative determination of safe superior transarticular screw trajectory through the lateral mass.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 15;24(14):1477-82. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199907150-00014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验