1 Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
2 Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB, Canada.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Nov;32(11):941-952. doi: 10.1177/1545968318801546. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Clinical trials are suggesting efficacy of intensive therapy combined with brain stimulation to improve hand function in hemiparetic children with perinatal stroke. However, individual variability exists and the underlying neuroplasticity mechanisms are unknown. Exploring primary motor cortex (M1) neurophysiology, and how it changes with such interventions, may provide valuable biomarkers for advancing personalized neurorehabilitation.
Forty-five children (age 6-19 years) with hemiparesis participated in PLASTIC CHAMPS, a blinded, sham-controlled, factorial clinical trial. All received 80 hours of goal-directed intensive upper extremity therapy. They were randomized into 4 groups: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of contralesional M1, constraint therapy, both, or neither. Stimulus recruitment curves (SRC), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) for lesioned and contralesional M1 were investigated using TMS. Clinical assessments including the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) were conducted pre- and postintervention.
All children completed the intervention and both function (AHA) and goal performance (COPM) improved with additive effects of rTMS and constraint ( P < .01). After intervention, motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes from the contralesional M1 to the less-affected hand increased (n = 16, P < .02). SRC from the contralesional M1 to the less-affected hand increased (n = 25, P < .01). SICI of the contralesional M1 to the less-affected hand decreased (n = 30, P < .04). No changes were observed for ICF in either hemisphere ( P > .12).
TMS applied before/after intensive neuromodulation therapies can explore M1 neurophysiology and plasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Increased MEP sizes and decreased SICI may reflect mechanisms of interventional plasticity and be potential biomarkers of individualized medicine.
临床试验表明,强化治疗联合脑刺激对围产期脑卒中偏瘫儿童手部功能的疗效。然而,个体差异存在,潜在的神经可塑性机制尚不清楚。探索初级运动皮层(M1)神经生理学及其如何随这些干预措施而变化,可能为推进个性化神经康复提供有价值的生物标志物。
45 名偏瘫儿童(6-19 岁)参加了 PLASTIC CHAMPS,这是一项盲法、假对照、析因临床试验。所有患者均接受 80 小时的目标导向性上肢强化治疗。他们被随机分为 4 组:对侧 M1 的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、约束治疗、两者兼有或两者均无。使用 TMS 研究了损伤侧和对侧 M1 的刺激募集曲线(SRC)、短间隔内皮质抑制(SICI)和皮质内易化(ICF)。在干预前后进行了临床评估,包括辅助手评估(AHA)和加拿大职业表现测量(COPM)。
所有儿童均完成了干预,且功能(AHA)和目标表现(COPM)均有改善,rTMS 和约束的作用具有累加效应(P <.01)。干预后,对侧 M1 到受影响较小的手的运动诱发电位(MEP)振幅增加(n = 16,P <.02)。对侧 M1 到受影响较小的手的 SRC 增加(n = 25,P <.01)。对侧 M1 到受影响较小的手的 SICI 减少(n = 30,P <.04)。对侧半球的 ICF 无变化(P >.12)。
在强化神经调节治疗前后应用 TMS 可探索脑瘫儿童的 M1 神经生理学和可塑性。MEP 大小增加和 SICI 减少可能反映干预性可塑性的机制,是个体化医学的潜在生物标志物。