Lafort Yves, Ismael de Melo Malica Sofia, Lessitala Faustino, Griffin Sally, Chersich Matthew, Delva Wim
International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
International Centre for Reproductive Health-Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3555-2.
Female sex workers (FSWs) in many settings have restricted access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. We therefore conducted an implementation study to test a 'diagonal' intervention which combined strengthening of FSW-targeted services (vertical) with making public health facilities more FSW-friendly (horizontal). We piloted it over 18 months and then assessed its performance.
Applying a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, we triangulated the results of the analysis of process indicators, semi-structured interviews with policy makers and health managers, structured interviews with health care providers and group discussions with peer outreach workers. We then formulated integrated conclusions on the interventions' feasibility, acceptability by providers, managers and policy makers, and potential sustainability.
The intervention, as designed, was considered theoretically feasible by all informants, but in practice the expansion of some of the targeted services was hampered by insufficient financial resources, institutional capacity and buy-in from local government and private partners, and could not be fully actualised. In terms of acceptability, there was broad consensus on the need to ensure FSWs have access to SRH services, but not on how this might be achieved. Targeted clinical services were no longer endorsed by national government, which now prefers a strategy of making public services more friendly for key populations. Stakeholders judged that the piloted model was not fully sustainable, nor replicable elsewhere in the country, given its dependency on short-term project-based funding, lack of government endorsement for targeted clinical services, and viewing the provision of community activities as a responsibility of civil society.
In the current Mozambican context, a 'diagonal' approach to ensure adequate access to sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers is not fully feasible, acceptable or sustainable, because of insufficient resources and lack of endorsement by national policy makers for the targeted, vertical component.
在许多地区,女性性工作者获得性与生殖健康(SRH)服务的机会有限。因此,我们开展了一项实施研究,以测试一种“对角”干预措施,该措施将加强针对性服务(纵向)与使公共卫生设施对女性性工作者更友好(横向)相结合。我们进行了为期18个月的试点,然后评估其效果。
采用收敛平行混合方法设计,我们将过程指标分析结果、与政策制定者和卫生管理人员的半结构化访谈、与医疗服务提供者的结构化访谈以及与同伴外展工作者的小组讨论结果进行了三角互证。然后,我们就干预措施的可行性、提供者、管理人员和政策制定者的可接受性以及潜在的可持续性得出了综合结论。
所有受访者都认为,从理论上讲,该干预措施是可行的,但在实践中,一些针对性服务的扩展受到财政资源不足、机构能力欠缺以及地方政府和私人合作伙伴支持不足的阻碍,无法完全实现。在可接受性方面,对于确保女性性工作者获得性与生殖健康服务的必要性存在广泛共识,但对于如何实现这一点却没有共识。国家政府不再支持针对性临床服务,现在更倾向于采取使公共服务对关键人群更友好的战略。利益相关者认为,鉴于该试点模式依赖基于项目的短期资金、缺乏政府对针对性临床服务的支持,以及将社区活动的提供视为民间社会的责任,该模式在该国其他地区既不完全可持续,也不可复制。
在当前莫桑比克的背景下,由于资源不足以及国家政策制定者对针对性纵向部分缺乏支持,采用“对角”方法确保女性性工作者充分获得性与生殖健康护理并不完全可行、可接受或可持续。