Namgoong Sik, Yang Jong-Phil, Jeong Seong Ho, Han Seung Kyu, Kim Woo Kyung, Dhong Eun Sang
a Department of Plastic Surgery , Korea University Guro Hospital , Seoul , South Korea.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Dec;52(6):367-374. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1523177. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Microvascular free flap transfer has become a prevailing surgery with a failure rate of <5%. However, pedicle thrombosis occurs more frequently than indicated by the failure rate. This difference is due to the successful salvage of failing flaps. During exploration, thrombi are often encountered at anastomotic sites, whereas these causes could not explain vascular compromise in other patients. Thus, we hypothesized that thrombogenic processes might occur at remote sites, specifically within microvessels of the transferred flap. This study retrospectively evaluated 323 patients who underwent microvascular free flap transfer between March 2012 and October 2016 at Korea University Guro Hospital. All patients requiring emergency exploration within 7 days after surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Of patients, 15 required explorative surgery for suspected circulatory compromise. Eight were diagnosed with thrombosis at the perianastomotic site and salvaged in accordance with our protocol. There was no detectable thrombosis at the anastomotic site in seven patients, including one patient in whom thrombosis resolved with topical papaverine application and heparinization. The remaining six patients were diagnosed with intra-flap microthrombosis without discernable thrombosis at the anastomotic site. All patients were treated following our urokinase administration protocol and salvaged without complications. Possible external causes should first be evaluated when salvaging free flaps; in the absence of such evidence, urokinase administration may be utilized as a last resort. This study is the first report describing the effectiveness of pharmacological thrombolysis in resolving intra-flap microthrombosis. Furthermore, a safe and efficient urokinase administration protocol is suggested for perianastomotic thrombosis and intra-flap microthrombosis.
微血管游离皮瓣移植已成为一种常用手术,失败率<5%。然而,蒂部血栓形成的发生率比失败率所显示的要高。这种差异是由于失败皮瓣的成功挽救。在探查过程中,常在吻合部位发现血栓,而这些原因无法解释其他患者的血管受损情况。因此,我们推测血栓形成过程可能发生在远处部位,特别是在移植皮瓣的微血管内。本研究回顾性评估了2012年3月至2016年10月在韩国大学古罗医院接受微血管游离皮瓣移植的323例患者。对所有术后7天内需要紧急探查的患者进行回顾性分析。其中,15例因怀疑循环受损而接受探查手术。8例被诊断为吻合口周围血栓形成,并按照我们的方案进行挽救。7例患者吻合口部位未检测到血栓形成,其中1例患者局部应用罂粟碱并肝素化后血栓溶解。其余6例患者被诊断为皮瓣内微血栓形成,吻合口部位无明显血栓形成。所有患者均按照我们的尿激酶给药方案进行治疗,挽救成功且无并发症。挽救游离皮瓣时应首先评估可能的外部原因;若无此类证据,尿激酶给药可作为最后手段。本研究是首篇描述药物溶栓治疗皮瓣内微血栓形成有效性的报告。此外,还提出了一种针对吻合口周围血栓形成和皮瓣内微血栓形成的安全有效的尿激酶给药方案。