Suppr超能文献

志趣相投的人?

Kindred spirits?

作者信息

Gamson Joshua

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Jun 27;7:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Abstract

In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I suggest that two threads connect these various aspects of reproductive politics: the commitment to self-determination, and an expanded understanding of kinship beyond the nuclear and the biological. These two themes stand in complicated tension - visible in debates over the ethics of surrogacy, for instance, and in the ways that queer family-making is facilitated, in part, by class and racial inequalities - that need to be confronted head-on. I conclude with some examples of what political kinship built around family justice can and does look like at the level of concrete action.

摘要

在这篇评论中,我思考了为扩大生育选择、减少通过辅助生殖和收养构建家庭过程中的不平等现象、保障和保护生殖权利以及追求生殖正义所做的各种努力之间的联系与矛盾。我认为有两条线索将生殖政治的这些不同方面联系起来:对自决的承诺,以及对亲属关系的理解超越核心家庭和生物学范畴。这两个主题处于复杂的紧张关系之中——例如在关于代孕伦理的辩论中可见一斑,在某种程度上,同性恋者组建家庭也受到阶级和种族不平等的推动——这种紧张关系需要直接面对。我以一些围绕家庭正义构建的政治亲属关系在具体行动层面的样子为例进行总结。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验