Gamson Joshua
Department of Sociology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Jun 27;7:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002. eCollection 2018 Nov.
In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I suggest that two threads connect these various aspects of reproductive politics: the commitment to self-determination, and an expanded understanding of kinship beyond the nuclear and the biological. These two themes stand in complicated tension - visible in debates over the ethics of surrogacy, for instance, and in the ways that queer family-making is facilitated, in part, by class and racial inequalities - that need to be confronted head-on. I conclude with some examples of what political kinship built around family justice can and does look like at the level of concrete action.
在这篇评论中,我思考了为扩大生育选择、减少通过辅助生殖和收养构建家庭过程中的不平等现象、保障和保护生殖权利以及追求生殖正义所做的各种努力之间的联系与矛盾。我认为有两条线索将生殖政治的这些不同方面联系起来:对自决的承诺,以及对亲属关系的理解超越核心家庭和生物学范畴。这两个主题处于复杂的紧张关系之中——例如在关于代孕伦理的辩论中可见一斑,在某种程度上,同性恋者组建家庭也受到阶级和种族不平等的推动——这种紧张关系需要直接面对。我以一些围绕家庭正义构建的政治亲属关系在具体行动层面的样子为例进行总结。