Savill Mark, Gosdin Melissa, Patel Pooja, Melnikow Joy, Loewy Rachel, Niendam Tara
Department of Psychiatry, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, Box 0984 266, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul;46(3):497-508. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9630-y.
Reducing the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is a key aim of early psychosis (EP) care. However, substantial variability in how the start and end points of DUP are defined impact its utility in clinical decision-making, and as an outcome measure. In this study, qualitative interviews were conducted with providers to assess how EP services and providers define, operationalize, and measure DUP. Twenty-five providers across 14 clinics were interviewed. Participants emphasized symptom frequency, conviction, distress caused, and impact when determining psychosis onset. DUP endpoint was typically identified as the first assessment in an episode of care that included an accurate diagnosis, leading to specialty EP treatment. Participants proposed a more structured operationalization of DUP, relative to those historically adopted in the literature. Integrating front-line provider perspectives could improve the accuracy of DUP measurement and address the heterogeneity in how the construct is operationalized across research and practice.
缩短未治疗精神病持续时间(DUP)是早期精神病(EP)护理的关键目标。然而,DUP起始点和终点的定义方式存在很大差异,这影响了其在临床决策中的效用以及作为一项结果指标的效用。在本研究中,对医疗服务提供者进行了定性访谈,以评估EP服务和提供者如何定义、实施和测量DUP。对14家诊所的25名医疗服务提供者进行了访谈。参与者在确定精神病发作时强调了症状频率、确信程度、造成的痛苦以及影响。DUP终点通常被确定为护理过程中首次包含准确诊断并导致专科EP治疗的评估。与文献中历来采用的方式相比,参与者提出了一种更具结构性的DUP实施方法。整合一线医疗服务提供者的观点可以提高DUP测量的准确性,并解决该概念在研究和实践中的实施方式存在的异质性问题。