Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo, Chile.
Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile.
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Feb;88(2):277-289. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12917. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Biotic interactions are central to the development of theory and concepts in community ecology; experimental evidence has shown their strong effects on patterns of population and community organization and dynamics over local spatial scales. The role of competition in determining range limits and preventing invasions at biogeographic scales is more controversial, partly because of the complexity of processes involved in species colonization of novel habitats and the difficulties in performing appropriate manipulations and controls. We examined experimentally whether competition is likely to affect poleward range expansion hindering or facilitating the establishment of the limpet Scurria viridula along the south-eastern Pacific rocky shore (30°S, Chile) in the region occupied by the congeneric S. zebrina. We also assessed whether competition with the "invader" or range-expanding species could reduce individual performance of the "native" S. zebrina and depress local populations Geographic field surveys were conducted to characterize the abundance and identity of limpets along the south-eastern Pacific coast from 18°S to 41°S, and the micro-scale (few cm) spatial distribution across the range overlap of the two species. Field-based competition experiments were conducted at the southern leading edge of the range of S. viridula (33°S) and at the northern limit of S. zebrina (30°S). Field surveys showed poleward range expansion of S. viridula of ca. 210 km since year 2000, with an expansion rate of 13.1 km/year. No range shift was detected for S. zebrina. The resident S. zebrina had significant negative effects on the growth rate of the invading juvenile S. viridula, while no effect of the latter was found on S. zebrina. Spatial segregation between species was found at the scale of cms. Our results provide novel evidence of an asymmetric competitive effect of a resident species on an invader, which may hamper further range expansion. No negative effect of the invader on the resident species was detected. This study highlights the complexities of evaluating the role of species interactions in setting range limits of species, but showed how interspecific competition might slow the advance of an invader by reducing individual performance and overall population size at the advancing front.
生物相互作用是社区生态学理论和概念发展的核心;实验证据表明,它们对种群和群落组织以及局部空间尺度上的动态模式具有强烈影响。竞争在确定生物地理尺度上的范围限制和防止入侵方面的作用更具争议性,部分原因是物种对新栖息地的殖民化过程涉及到的复杂性,以及进行适当的操作和控制的困难。我们通过实验检验了竞争是否可能影响极地范围的扩展,从而阻碍或促进同种的石鳖 Scurria viridula 在东南太平洋多岩石海岸(智利 30°S)的建立。我们还评估了与“入侵”或扩张物种的竞争是否会降低“本地”S. zebrina 的个体表现,并抑制当地种群的数量。地理实地调查是沿着东南太平洋海岸从 18°S 到 41°S 进行的,以确定石鳖的丰度和身份,并评估两种物种重叠范围的微观尺度(几厘米)的空间分布。在石鳖 Scurria viridula 的南部前缘(33°S)和 S. zebrina 的北部极限(30°S)进行了基于现场的竞争实验。实地调查显示,自 2000 年以来,S. viridula 的极地范围扩展了约 210 公里,扩展速度为 13.1 公里/年。S. zebrina 的范围没有变化。本地的 S. zebrina 对入侵的幼年 S. viridula 的生长速度有显著的负向影响,而后者对 S. zebrina 没有影响。在厘米级的尺度上发现了物种之间的空间分离。我们的研究结果提供了一种新的证据,证明了本地物种对入侵物种的竞争具有不对称影响,这可能会阻碍进一步的范围扩展。没有发现入侵物种对本地物种的负面影响。这项研究强调了评估物种相互作用在确定物种范围限制方面的复杂性,但也表明了种间竞争如何通过降低前沿推进个体表现和整体种群大小来减缓入侵物种的推进。