Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Via di Grottarossa, 1035/1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Int Orthop. 2019 Jan;43(1):237-242. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4195-1. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
To compare the results of two different open surgical techniques (open capsuloplasty and Bristow-Latarjet procedure) at a mid- to long-term follow-up (6 years) in patients with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations.
Seventy-three patients (73 shoulders, 48 males; 25 females) fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were classified as group A if operated on with a Bristow-Latarjet procedure (40 patients, 24 males; 16 females) or group B if operated on with an open capsuloplasty (33 patients, 24 males; 9 females). All patients were followed up with physical examination and functional evaluation scores (UCLA, ROWE and WOSI).
In group A, no further episodes of dislocation or subluxation were reported; in group B, one patient (3.3%) reported a new episode of anterior dislocation as a result of a new trauma. No statistical difference in regard of new episodes of shoulder dislocation was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). At physical examination, two patients (5%) of group A and four patients of group B (13.3%) showed a positive apprehension test (p > 0.05); anterior drawer test was positive in six patients (15%) of group A and in nine patients (30%) of group B (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis showed better external rotation in group A (Latarjet group) than in group B. (p = 0.0176). No statistical differences were detected in regard to the scale scores (UCLA, WOSI, Rowe) (p > 0.05). Regarding the return to sport, 29 patients (72.5%) of group A and 18 patients (60%) of group B reported they resumed the same sports activity at the same pre-operative level (p > 0.05).
Open capsuloplasty and Bristow-Latarjet procedure are both validated surgical techniques for the treatment of recurrent shoulder anterior instability. We found no statistical difference in terms of recurrent dislocation rates, clinical shoulder stability tests, and scoring scales. The rate of patients returning to sport was similar after both techniques. However, patients with open capsuloplasty reported a significantly lower recovery of external rotation than patients operated via the Latarjet procedure.
比较两种不同开放式手术技术(开放囊切开术和 Bristow-Latarjet 手术)在复发性创伤性前肩脱位患者的中至长期随访(6 年)中的结果。
73 名患者(73 个肩部,48 名男性;25 名女性)符合纳入和排除标准。如果患者接受 Bristow-Latarjet 手术(40 例,24 名男性;16 名女性),则将其分类为 A 组,如果接受开放囊切开术(33 例,24 名男性;9 名女性),则将其分类为 B 组。所有患者均接受体格检查和功能评估评分(UCLA、ROWE 和 WOSI)。
在 A 组中,没有进一步的脱位或半脱位发作;在 B 组中,1 名患者(3.3%)因新创伤而出现新的前脱位发作。两组之间在新的肩脱位发作方面无统计学差异(p>0.05)。体格检查时,A 组有 2 名患者(5%)和 B 组有 4 名患者(13.3%)出现阳性恐惧试验(p>0.05);A 组有 6 名患者(15%)和 B 组有 9 名患者(30%)出现前抽屉试验阳性(p>0.05)。统计学分析显示 A 组(Latarjet 组)的外旋旋转优于 B 组(p=0.0176)。在评分量表(UCLA、WOSI、Rowe)方面,两组间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。在重返运动方面,A 组有 29 名患者(72.5%)和 B 组有 18 名患者(60%)报告他们以相同的术前水平恢复了相同的运动活动(p>0.05)。
开放囊切开术和 Bristow-Latarjet 手术都是治疗复发性肩前不稳定的有效手术技术。我们发现,在复发性脱位率、临床肩部稳定性测试和评分量表方面没有统计学差异。两种技术后,患者重返运动的比例相似。然而,接受开放囊切开术的患者报告外旋恢复明显低于接受 Latarjet 手术的患者。