Kim Chang Keun, Callaway Zak, Park Jin Sung, Nishimori Hisashi, Ogino Tikatoshi, Nagao Mizuho, Fujisawa Takao
Asthma & Allergy Center, Department of Pediatrics, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 Nov;10(6):686-697. doi: 10.4168/aair.2018.10.6.686.
Several markers for eosinophilic inflammation have been proposed to predict response to asthma treatment. However, definitive criteria for treatment decisions have not yet been established. We investigate a potentially useful relatively non-invasive biomarker, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), to predict favorable responses to budesonide or montelukast, common treatment for children with asthma.
Young children (1 to 6 years old) were enrolled in this randomized, parallel, 2-group, open-label trial. Criteria for eligibility included: 1) being symptomatic during the run-in period; and 2) having a serum EDN (sEDN) level ≥ 53 ng/mL, with positive specific immunoglobulin E to house dust mite. Eligible patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: the BIS group received budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) 0.5 mg once daily; the MONT group received montelukast 4 mg once daily. Ineligible patients were invited to receive montelukast 4 mg once daily (OBS group). Treatment period was 12 weeks.
Asthma control days increased significantly in the BIS and MONT groups ( < 0.000) over the 12-week study period. There was no significant change in sEDN in the BIS group but there was a significant decrease in the MONT group ( < 0.000). Patients in the OBS group with high EDN levels (< 53 ng/mL) showed a significant decrease due to MONT treatment ( = 0.023). Rescue medication usage significantly decreased in the BIS and MONT groups ( < 0.000).
EDN is a useful relatively non-invasive biomarker for predicting responses to montelukast and budesonide treatment of preschool children with beta2-agonist responsive recurrent wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze (Trial registry at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000008335).
已提出多种嗜酸性粒细胞炎症标志物来预测哮喘治疗反应。然而,尚未确立用于治疗决策的明确标准。我们研究一种潜在有用的相对非侵入性生物标志物——嗜酸性粒细胞衍生神经毒素(EDN),以预测对布地奈德或孟鲁司特(哮喘患儿的常用治疗药物)的良好反应。
幼儿(1至6岁)纳入了这项随机、平行、两组、开放标签试验。入选标准包括:1)在导入期有症状;2)血清EDN(sEDN)水平≥53 ng/mL,对屋尘螨特异性免疫球蛋白E呈阳性。符合条件的患者随机分为两组:布地奈德吸入混悬液(BIS)组每日一次吸入0.5 mg布地奈德;孟鲁司特组每日一次服用4 mg孟鲁司特。不符合条件的患者被邀请每日一次服用4 mg孟鲁司特(观察组)。治疗期为12周。
在12周的研究期内,BIS组和孟鲁司特组的哮喘控制天数显著增加(<0.000)。BIS组的sEDN无显著变化,但孟鲁司特组有显著下降(<0.000)。观察组中EDN水平高(<53 ng/mL)的患者经孟鲁司特治疗后有显著下降(=0.023)。BIS组和孟鲁司特组的急救药物使用量显著减少(<0.000)。
EDN是一种有用的相对非侵入性生物标志物,可用于预测β2激动剂反应性复发性喘息和多触发因素喘息的学龄前儿童对孟鲁司特和布地奈德治疗的反应(试验注册于UMIN临床试验注册中心,UMIN000008335)。