Suppr超能文献

拉米夫定单药治疗作为 HIV 阳性儿童的维持治疗方案。

Lamivudine monotherapy as a holding regimen for HIV-positive children.

机构信息

Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology & Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Médecins Sans Frontières Khayelitsha, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205455. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In resource-limited settings holding regimens, such as lamivudine monotherapy (LM), are used to manage HIV-positive children failing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) to mitigate the risk of drug resistance developing, whilst adherence barriers are addressed or when access to second- or third-line regimens is restricted. We aimed to investigate characteristics of children placed on LM and their outcomes.

METHODS

We describe the characteristics of children (age <16 years at cART start) from 5 IeDEA-SA cohorts with a record of LM during their treatment history. Among those on LM for >90 days we describe their immunologic outcomes on LM and their immunologic and virologic outcomes after resuming cART.

FINDINGS

We included 228 children in our study. At LM start their median age was 12.0 years (IQR 7.3-14.6), duration on cART was 3.6 years (IQR 2.0-5.9) and median CD4 count was 605.5 cells/μL (IQR 427-901). Whilst 110 (48%) had no prior protease inhibitor (PI)-exposure, of the 69 with recorded PI-exposure, 9 (13%) patients had documented resistance to all PIs. After 6 months on LM, 70% (94/135) experienced a drop in CD4, with a predicted average CD4 decline of 46.5 cells/μL (95% CI 37.7-55.4). Whilst on LM, 46% experienced a drop in CD4 to <500 cells/μL, 18 (8%) experienced WHO stage 3 or 4 events, and 3 children died. On resumption of cART the average gain in CD4 was 15.65 cells/uL per month and 66.6% (95% CI 59.3-73.7) achieved viral suppression (viral load <1000) at 6 months after resuming cART.

INTERPRETATION

Most patients experienced immune decline on LM. Its use should be avoided in those with low CD4 counts, but restricted use may be necessary when treatment options are limited. Managing children with virologic failure will continue to be challenging until more treatment options and better adherence strategies are available.

摘要

背景

在资源有限的情况下,会采用拉米夫定单药治疗(LM)来管理接受联合抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)后失败的 HIV 阳性儿童,以降低耐药性产生的风险,同时解决药物依从性的障碍,或在二线或三线治疗方案受到限制时使用。我们旨在研究接受 LM 治疗的儿童的特征及其结局。

方法

我们描述了来自 5 个 IeDEA-SA 队列的儿童(cART 开始时年龄<16 岁)的特征,这些儿童在治疗过程中有记录的 LM 治疗史。在接受 LM 治疗>90 天的儿童中,我们描述了他们在 LM 治疗期间的免疫结果,以及在恢复 cART 后他们的免疫和病毒学结果。

结果

我们的研究纳入了 228 名儿童。在开始接受 LM 治疗时,他们的中位年龄为 12.0 岁(IQR 7.3-14.6),接受 cART 的时间为 3.6 年(IQR 2.0-5.9),中位 CD4 计数为 605.5 个/μL(IQR 427-901)。尽管有 110 名(48%)儿童之前未接受过蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)治疗,但在有记录的 PI 暴露的 69 名儿童中,有 9 名(13%)患者对所有 PI 均有耐药性。在接受 LM 治疗 6 个月后,70%(94/135)的儿童 CD4 下降,预计平均 CD4 下降 46.5 个/μL(95%CI 37.7-55.4)。在接受 LM 治疗期间,有 46%的儿童 CD4 下降到<500 个/μL,18 名(8%)儿童出现世界卫生组织(WHO)第 3 或 4 期事件,有 3 名儿童死亡。在恢复 cART 后,CD4 平均每月增加 15.65 个/μL,66.6%(95%CI 59.3-73.7)在恢复 cART 后 6 个月时达到病毒载量<1000 的病毒抑制。

结论

大多数患者在接受 LM 治疗后免疫功能下降。在 CD4 计数较低时应避免使用 LM,但在治疗选择有限时,可能需要限制使用。在有更多的治疗选择和更好的依从性策略之前,管理病毒学失败的儿童将继续具有挑战性。

相似文献

1
Lamivudine monotherapy as a holding regimen for HIV-positive children.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205455. eCollection 2018.
2
Lamivudine Monotherapy: Experience of Medium-term Outcomes in HIV-infected Children Unable to Adhere to Triple Therapy.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):e199-205. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001156.
7
Lamivudine monotherapy in children and adolescents: The devil is in the detail.
S Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 27;107(12):1055-1057. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i12.12776.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns and prognosis of holding regimens for people living with HIV in Asian countries.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 30;17(3):e0264157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264157. eCollection 2022.
3
Antiretroviral adherence for adolescents growing up with HIV: understanding real life, drug delivery and forgiveness.
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2020 May 7;7:2049936120920177. doi: 10.1177/2049936120920177. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Second- and Third-line Antiretroviral Therapy for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 May;36(5):492-499. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001481.
3
Lamivudine Monotherapy: Experience of Medium-term Outcomes in HIV-infected Children Unable to Adhere to Triple Therapy.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):e199-205. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001156.
6
Antiretroviral treatment, management challenges and outcomes in perinatally HIV-infected adolescents.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2013 Jun 18;16(1):18579. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.18579.
7
Cohort Profile: the international epidemiological databases to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) in sub-Saharan Africa.
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;41(5):1256-64. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr080. Epub 2011 May 18.
8
Virologic failure and second-line antiretroviral therapy in children in South Africa--the IeDEA Southern Africa collaboration.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Mar 1;56(3):270-8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182060610.
10
Pediatric adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009 Nov;6(4):194-200. doi: 10.1007/s11904-009-0026-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验