Suppr超能文献

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)用于预测重症监护患者的压疮风险:一项回顾性队列研究。

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) to Predict Pressure Ulcer Risk in Intensive Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Ahtiala Maarit, Soppi Esa, Saari Teijo

机构信息

Service Division, Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Eira Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Oct;64(10):32-38.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Pressure ulcer (PU) risk assessment practices in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients remain varied.

PURPOSE

The authors assessed the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale and its subcategories in predicting the development of PUs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients admitted to the mixed medical-surgical ICU of a Finnish tertiary referral hospital between January 2010 and December 2012. Data (diagnoses, demographics, clinical information, treatments, and instrument scores) were retrieved from the ICU database. Wilcoxon and chi-squared tests were used to examine patient subgroup (medical or surgical ICU and intensive care or high-dependency care patients), length of ICU stay (LOS), modified Jackson/Cubbin (mJ/C) scores and SOFA subcategory variables, and first-day SOFA scores. PU association was determined by logistical regression.

RESULTS

Among the 4899 patients in the study population, the overall PU incidence of acquired PUs was 8.1%. Medical patients had significantly more PUs (145/1281; 11.3%) than surgical patients (212/3468; 6.1%) (P <.0001). In all subgroups, significantly more patients with PUs had higher SOFA scores (mean 8.24) than patients without PUs (mean 6.74) (P =.001). The difference persisted when patients with LOS ≥3 days in the ICU were considered. Among the SOFA subcategories, the Glasgow Coma score, renal and respiratory disorders, and hypotension were significantly (P <.0001) linked to PU development. First-day total SOFA score and its cardiovascular and respiratory subcategory scores were the most important predictors of PUs.

CONCLUSION

The total SOFA score provides an additional tool to assess PU risk in ICUs and should be used together with the Braden or the mJ/C Scale.

摘要

未标注

成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者的压疮(PU)风险评估方法仍存在差异。

目的

作者评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表及其子类别在预测压疮发生方面的表现。

方法

对2010年1月至2012年12月期间入住芬兰一家三级转诊医院综合内科/外科ICU的所有成年患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从ICU数据库中检索数据(诊断、人口统计学、临床信息、治疗方法和仪器评分)。采用Wilcoxon检验和卡方检验来检查患者亚组(内科或外科ICU以及重症监护或高依赖护理患者)、ICU住院时间(LOS)、改良Jackson/Cubbin(mJ/C)评分和SOFA子类别变量,以及首日SOFA评分。通过逻辑回归确定压疮关联。

结果

在研究人群的4899例患者中,获得性压疮的总体发生率为8.1%。内科患者发生压疮的比例(145/1281;11.3%)显著高于外科患者(212/3468;6.1%)(P<.0001)。在所有亚组中,发生压疮的患者的SOFA评分(平均8.24)显著高于未发生压疮的患者(平均6.74)(P =.001)。当考虑在ICU住院时间≥3天的患者时,这种差异仍然存在。在SOFA子类别中,格拉斯哥昏迷评分、肾脏和呼吸系统疾病以及低血压与压疮发生显著相关(P<.0001)。首日总SOFA评分及其心血管和呼吸子类别评分是压疮最重要的预测指标。

结论

总SOFA评分提供了一种额外的工具来评估ICU中的压疮风险,应与Braden量表或mJ/C量表一起使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验