Suppr超能文献

博来霉素和非格司亭的肺毒性风险。

Risk of pulmonary toxicity of bleomycin and filgrastim.

作者信息

Laprise-Lachance Magali, Lemieux Pierre, Grégoire Jean-Pierre

机构信息

1 Department of Pharmacy, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, site Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Lévis, Quebec, Canada.

2 Department of Pharmacy, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec, site Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire régional de Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Oct;25(7):1638-1644. doi: 10.1177/1078155218804293. Epub 2018 Oct 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the relative risk of pulmonary toxicity in patients exposed to a bleomycin-based chemotherapy including filgrastim compared to a similar chemotherapy without filgrastim.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study of patients treated with BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) for germ cell cancer or with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) for Hodgkin's lymphoma at the Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital between 31 October 2000 and 30 June 2016. The relative risk was estimated by an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) using a propensity score-adjusted regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen cases of pulmonary toxicity, representing 14.7% of the 88 patients included in the study, were matched with 65 controls. A higher proportion of women (31.8%) than men (11.3%) developed pulmonary toxicity although the difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.08). Within the cohort, two deaths related to lung toxicity were observed among cases where no filgrastim was used. The risk of pulmonary toxicity associated with the addition of filgrastim was not statistically significant (aOR = 2.48 95% CI = 0.50 to 12.19).

CONCLUSION

The results add further evidence that the concomitant use of filgrastim might not increase the risk of pulmonary toxicity of bleomycin. It also suggests that female patients might be more likely to develop this adverse effect. A clinical trial would be needed to confirm this result.

摘要

目的

评估接受含非格司亭的博来霉素化疗的患者与接受不含非格司亭的类似化疗的患者相比发生肺毒性的相对风险。

方法

我们对2000年10月31日至2016年6月30日期间在勒维圣约瑟夫医院接受BEP(博来霉素、依托泊苷和顺铂)治疗生殖细胞癌或接受ABVD(多柔比星、博来霉素、长春花碱和达卡巴嗪)治疗霍奇金淋巴瘤的患者进行了一项巢式病例对照研究。使用倾向评分调整回归分析通过调整后的优势比(aOR)估计相对风险。

结果

13例肺毒性病例(占纳入研究的88例患者的14.7%)与65例对照进行了匹配。发生肺毒性的女性比例(31.8%)高于男性(11.3%),尽管差异无统计学意义(P = 0.08)。在队列中,在未使用非格司亭的病例中观察到2例与肺毒性相关的死亡。添加非格司亭相关的肺毒性风险无统计学意义(aOR = 2.48,95% CI = 0.50至12.19)。

结论

结果进一步证明,同时使用非格司亭可能不会增加博来霉素肺毒性的风险。这也表明女性患者可能更易发生这种不良反应。需要进行一项临床试验来证实这一结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验