Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Poult Sci. 2019 Mar 1;98(3):1333-1340. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey457.
An experiment was conducted to investigate which method, apparent ileal digestibility (AID) or standardized ileal digestibility (SID), more accurately predicts the digestibility of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) in mixed diets fed to broiler chickens. Male Ross 308 broiler chickens received a standard starter diet from d 0 to 16 post hatching, thereafter grouped into 8 blocks, based on body weight (BW), of 10 birds/cage, and randomly allotted to 6 diets in a randomized complete block design. The 6 diets consisted of a nitrogen-free diet, 3 semi-purified diets, and 2 mixed diets to test the additivity of AID and SID in mixed diets. On d 21 post hatching, digesta from two-thirds of the distal ileum was collected. Using the determined AID or SID for CP and AA in wheat, canola meal (CM), or sorghum distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), the AID or SID for 2 mixed diets based on wheat-CM or wheat-CM-DDGS were predicted and compared with determined AID or SID, respectively. The results revealed that the predicted SID of CP and AA in the wheat-CM mixed diet were consistent with determined values except for Asp and Ser, and all the predicted SID of CP and AA were consistent with the determined values in the wheat-CM-DDGS mixed diet. The determined AID of Ile, Met, Thr, Val, Ala, Cys, Ser, and Tyr in the wheat-CM mixed diet were greater (P < 0.05) than predicted AID values. For the wheat-CM-DDGS mixed diet, the determined AID of Trp, Cys, and Glu were greater (P < 0.05) than the predicted AID values. However, there were more inconsistencies between the determined and predicted values in AID values for wheat-CM than the wheat-CM-DDGS mixed diet than SID values for both diets. In conclusion, the present study confirmed that the SID of CP and AA was more additive than the AID of CP and AA when a mixed diet contained wheat, CM, and DDGS as protein sources in broiler chickens.
进行了一项实验,以研究哪种方法(表观回肠可消化性(AID)或标准回肠可消化性(SID))更能准确预测肉鸡混合日粮中粗蛋白(CP)和氨基酸(AA)的消化率。雄性罗斯 308 肉鸡在孵化后 0 至 16 天接受标准起始日粮,此后根据体重(BW)分为 8 个组块,每个组块 10 只鸡/笼,随机分配到 6 种日粮的完全随机组块设计中。这 6 种日粮包括无氮日粮、3 种半纯化日粮和 2 种混合日粮,以测试混合日粮中 AID 和 SID 的可加性。在孵化后 21 天,收集三分之二远端回肠的食糜。使用小麦、菜籽油粕(CM)或高粱酒糟可溶物(DDGS)中 CP 和 AA 的确定 AID 或 SID,预测基于小麦-CM 或小麦-CM-DDGS 的 2 种混合日粮的 AID 或 SID,并分别与确定的 AID 或 SID 进行比较。结果表明,除了 Asp 和 Ser 外,基于小麦-CM 的混合日粮中 CP 和 AA 的预测 SID 与实测值一致,而基于小麦-CM-DDGS 的混合日粮中 CP 和 AA 的所有预测 SID 与实测值一致。在基于小麦-CM 的混合日粮中,Ile、Met、Thr、Val、Ala、Cys、Ser 和 Tyr 的确定 AID 高于(P<0.05)预测 AID 值。对于基于小麦-CM-DDGS 的混合日粮,Trp、Cys 和 Glu 的确定 AID 高于(P<0.05)预测 AID 值。然而,在基于小麦-CM 的混合日粮中,确定的 AID 值与预测值之间的不一致性比 SID 值在两种日粮中都更常见。总之,本研究证实,当混合日粮中含有小麦、CM 和 DDGS 作为蛋白质来源时,CP 和 AA 的 SID 比 CP 和 AA 的 AID 更具加性。