Suppr超能文献

在温带森林中,针叶树而非被子植物在叶片和枝条之间表现出脆弱性分段。

Conifers but not angiosperms exhibit vulnerability segmentation between leaves and branches in a temperate forest.

机构信息

Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Road, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Tree Physiol. 2019 Mar 1;39(3):454-462. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy111.

Abstract

Vulnerability segmentation (VS), an important mechanism for protecting plants from drought, hypothesizes that the distal organs of a plant should be more susceptible to embolism than the basal organs. However, experimental studies testing the VS hypothesis for trees are limited and have reached inconsistent conclusions. Here, we tested the VS hypothesis with three angiosperms and four conifers co-existing in a temperate forest in northeastern China. The results showed that the difference in vulnerability to cavitation between leaves and branches (P50leaf-branch) was positive for the conifers but negative for the angiosperms, implying that the conifers rather than the angiosperms exhibited VS. The conifers had lower leaf hydraulic safety margins and more embolism-resistant branches than the angiosperms. Although the angiosperms did not display VS, they took a hydraulic compensatory strategy (e.g., great leaf and branch hydraulic conductivities) to maintain the water supply of their leaves. In addition, we found a significant trade-off between the sapwood-specific hydraulic conductivity (KSS) and xylem pressure inducing 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity (P50branch) across all species. Both KSS and P50branch increased with the area-based light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Aarea), suggesting that increased embolism resistance of branches comes at the cost of reduced hydraulic efficiency, which in turn constrains the photosynthesis. Aarea was negatively correlated with P50leaf-branch, further indicating that the conifers had strong VS and were associated with a conservative strategy. Conversely, the angiosperms displayed an acquisitive strategy, tending to have higher Aarea, leaf and branch hydraulic conductivities, but lower embolism resistance. These differentiations in the functional traits between the angiosperms and conifers provide potential mechanisms for their co-existence in this temperate forest community.

摘要

易损性分割(VS)是植物抵御干旱的一种重要机制,该机制假设植物的远端器官比基部器官更容易受到栓塞的影响。然而,针对树木的 VS 假说的实验研究有限,且得到的结论并不一致。在这里,我们在中国东北温带森林中共同生长的三种被子植物和四种裸子植物中检验了 VS 假说。结果表明,裸子植物的叶片与枝条间易损性差异(P50leaf-branch)为正相关,而被子植物为负相关,这意味着裸子植物而非被子植物表现出 VS。裸子植物的叶片水力安全边际较低,且具有更抗栓塞的枝条。尽管被子植物没有表现出 VS,但它们采取了水力补偿策略(例如,叶片和枝条具有较高的水力导度)来维持叶片的供水。此外,我们发现所有物种的边材比水力导率(KSS)与木质部压力诱导 50%水力导率丧失(P50branch)之间存在显著的权衡关系。KSS 和 P50branch 都随基于面积的光饱和光合速率(Aarea)增加而增加,这表明枝条栓塞抗性的增加是以降低水力效率为代价的,而水力效率的降低又会限制光合作用。Aarea 与 P50leaf-branch 呈负相关,这进一步表明裸子植物具有很强的 VS,并且与保守策略相关。相反,被子植物表现出一种获取性策略,倾向于具有较高的 Aarea、叶片和枝条的水力导率,但栓塞抗性较低。这些被子植物和裸子植物在功能性状上的差异为它们在温带森林群落中的共存提供了潜在的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验