Suppr超能文献

区域麻醉与全身麻醉:麻醉技术对腰椎手术临床结果的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Regional Versus General Anesthesia: Effect of Anesthetic Techniques on Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Clinic of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy.

Center of Neuro- and Spine Surgery, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna Lucerne.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan;32(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000555.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are only a few prospective clinical trials investigating the effects of different anesthetic techniques on clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients receiving general (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) for lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-center, 2-arm, trial in which 100 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomized to receive either RA or GA (50 per group). The primary endpoint was morphine consumption during the first postoperative 48 hours. In addition, anesthesia time, transition time (defined as time from end of surgery to admission to the postoperative anesthesia care unit), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction at hospital discharge were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the primary endpoint (cumulative morphine consumption at 48 h) between the 2 anesthesia types. Anesthesia and transition times were significantly shorter in the RA compared with the GA group-anesthesia time 125.4±23.6 minutes for GA versus 99.4±13.5 minutes for RA, transition time 22.5 minutes for GA versus 10.0 minutes for RA (both P<0.001). The VAS for pain on arrival to the postoperative anesthetic care unit was lower for patients who received RA compared with GA (crude and adjusted, both <0.001). 84% of patients in the RA group were completely satisfied compared with 74% in the GA group (P<0.001). There was a significant difference in the sex analysis for VAS for pain over time; females reported higher VAS for pain from the preoperative assessment to 6 weeks after the operation (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in postoperative morphine consumption in patients receiving GA and RA for lumbar spine surgery. RA was associated with shorter anesthesia and transition times, lower VAS for pain at arrival at the postoperative anesthesia care unit, and higher patient satisfaction at hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

仅有少数前瞻性临床试验研究了不同麻醉技术对腰椎手术后临床结果的影响。本研究旨在评估接受全身麻醉(GA)和区域麻醉(RA)的腰椎手术患者的临床结果。

方法

这是一项单中心、2 臂试验,将 100 例接受腰椎手术的患者随机分为接受 RA 或 GA(每组 50 例)。主要终点是术后 48 小时内的吗啡消耗量。此外,还记录了麻醉时间、过渡时间(定义为手术结束至术后麻醉护理单元入院的时间)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和出院时患者满意度。

结果

两种麻醉类型在主要终点(48 小时内累积吗啡消耗量)上无差异。RA 组的麻醉和过渡时间明显短于 GA 组-麻醉时间 GA 组为 125.4±23.6 分钟,RA 组为 99.4±13.5 分钟,过渡时间 GA 组为 22.5 分钟,RA 组为 10.0 分钟(均 P<0.001)。接受 RA 的患者到达术后麻醉护理单元时的疼痛 VAS 较低,与 GA 相比(未经调整和调整后,均<0.001)。RA 组 84%的患者完全满意,GA 组 74%的患者满意(P<0.001)。在性别分析中,疼痛 VAS 随时间的变化有显著差异;女性从术前评估到术后 6 周报告的疼痛 VAS 更高(P<0.001)。

结论

接受 GA 和 RA 的腰椎手术患者术后吗啡消耗量无差异。RA 与麻醉和过渡时间较短、到达术后麻醉护理单元时疼痛 VAS 较低以及出院时患者满意度较高相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验