Ugradar Shoaib, Goldberg Robert, Rootman Daniel
a Stein Eye Institute, Division of Orbital and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, University of California-Los Angeles , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
b Doheny Eye Institute, Division of Orbital and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, University of California-Los Angeles , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Orbit. 2019 Aug;38(4):305-307. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1528619. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
: To characterise variations in the location of the optic canal and its entry into the orbit in relation to the sphenoid sinus. : In this observational study, patients with high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans seen by 2 specialists (RG and DR) over a period of 12 years were reviewed for study entry. The primary outcome measure was characterisation of the optic canal route in relation to the sphenoid sinus and the location of its opening within the orbit. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the bony orbits were created using the Mimics imaging software. Optic canals were classified according to the location of their entry into the orbit. Type 1 was defined as a canalicular course along the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus and entry into the orbit through the medial wall. Type 2 was defined as a canalicular course in the superior wall of the sphenoid sinus with entry into the orbit through the roof. The angle of entry of each nerve into the orbit was calculated. : One-hundred patients (52 females and 48 males) contributed 100 orbits to the study. Type 1 configuration was noted in 90 orbits, whereas Type 2 was noted in 10 orbits. The mean angle (SD) of entry of Type 1 optic nerves into the orbit was 61° (10.7), whereas the angle of entry of Type 2 nerves was 32.35° (6.8). The difference was significant ( < 0.01). : This study demonstrates variability of the path and outlet of the optic canal and presents a relatively common (10%) configuration in which the optic canal travels in the roof of the sphenoid sinus rather than the expected position in the lateral wall.
描述视神经管的位置及其进入眼眶与蝶窦的关系。在这项观察性研究中,回顾了12年间由2位专家(RG和DR)看过的高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者以纳入研究。主要观察指标是视神经管路径与蝶窦的关系及其在眼眶内开口的位置。使用Mimics成像软件创建眼眶骨的三维重建。根据视神经管进入眼眶的位置进行分类。1型定义为沿蝶窦外侧壁的小管状路径并通过内侧壁进入眼眶。2型定义为在蝶窦上壁的小管状路径并通过眶顶进入眼眶。计算每条神经进入眼眶的角度。100名患者(52名女性和48名男性)为该研究贡献了100个眼眶。90个眼眶为1型结构,而10个眼眶为2型结构。1型视神经进入眼眶的平均角度(标准差)为61°(10.7),而2型神经的进入角度为32.35°(6.8)。差异具有统计学意义(<0.01)。这项研究表明视神经管的路径和出口存在变异性,并呈现出一种相对常见(10%)的结构,即视神经管走行于蝶窦顶部而非预期的外侧壁位置。