Suppr超能文献

对养猪业中使用的选定有机富集材料的卫生状况进行检查,特别关注病原菌。

Examination of the hygienic status of selected organic enrichment materials used in pig farming with special emphasis on pathogenic bacteria.

作者信息

Wagner Krista Marie, Schulz Jochen, Kemper Nicole

机构信息

Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour (ITTN), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), 30173 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2018 Oct 11;4:24. doi: 10.1186/s40813-018-0100-y. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enrichment materials for pigs, particularly organic materials, are becoming increasingly important in order to reduce abnormal behaviour such as tail biting. However, potential health risks posed by these materials (such as the introduction of pathogens into the herd) have not been sufficiently studied to date. Therefore, 21 different organic materials used as enrichment materials in pig farming were tested for total viable count of mesophilic bacteria, moulds, coliforms, , spp., spp., spp., methicillin-resistant , and spp. Additionally, dry matter content and water activity were determined.

RESULTS

The materials differed considerably in their hygienic status. In three materials, no microorganisms were detected. However, the bacterial count in the other materials ranged up to 7.89 log cfu/g dry matter (maize silage). The highest coliform and mould counts were found in hay (6.45 and 6.94 log cfu/g dry matter, respectively). Important bacteria presenting a risk to human or animal health such as , spp., spp., spp., and methicillin-resistant were not detected in any of the materials. Hemp straw contained and peat was contaminated with and .

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the tested organic materials are probably not likely to pose a hygienic risk to pigs and are suitable as enrichment material. Nonetheless the detected mycobacteria rule out peat as being a safe and hygienic enrichment material.

摘要

背景

为减少诸如咬尾等异常行为,猪的富集材料,尤其是有机材料正变得越来越重要。然而,这些材料所带来的潜在健康风险(如将病原体引入猪群)迄今为止尚未得到充分研究。因此,对养猪业中用作富集材料的21种不同有机材料进行了嗜温细菌、霉菌、大肠菌群、 菌属、 菌属、 菌属、耐甲氧西林 以及 菌属的总活菌数检测。此外,还测定了干物质含量和水分活度。

结果

这些材料的卫生状况差异很大。在三种材料中未检测到微生物。然而,其他材料中的细菌计数高达7.89 log cfu/g干物质(玉米青贮饲料)。干草中的大肠菌群和霉菌计数最高(分别为6.45和6.94 log cfu/g干物质)。在任何材料中均未检测到对人类或动物健康有风险的重要细菌,如 菌属、 菌属、 菌属、 菌属和耐甲氧西林 。大麻秸秆含有 ,泥炭被 和 污染。

结论

大多数测试的有机材料可能不会对猪构成卫生风险,适合作为富集材料。尽管如此,检测到的分枝杆菌排除了泥炭作为安全卫生富集材料的可能性。

相似文献

9
Pathogenic bacteria in Finnish bulk tank milk.芬兰散装奶中的致病菌。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013 Feb;10(2):99-106. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1284. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Genetic diversity and phylogeny of Mycobacterium avium.鸟分枝杆菌的遗传多样性与系统发育
Infect Genet Evol. 2014 Jan;21:375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验