Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 18;69(3):381-387. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy916.
Oral switch to linezolid is a promising alternative to standard parenteral therapy (SPT) in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).
We conducted a prospective cohort study of all adult cases of SAB between 2013 and 2017 in a Spanish university hospital. We compared the efficacy, safety, and length of hospital stay of patients receiving SPT and those where SPT was switched to oral linezolid between days 3 and 9 of treatment until completion. We excluded complicated SAB and osteoarticular infections. A k-nearest neighbor algorithm was used for propensity score matching with a 2:1 ratio.
After propensity score matching, we included 45 patients from the linezolid group and 90 patients from the SPT group. Leading SAB sources were catheter related (49.6%), unknown origin (20.0%), and skin and soft tissue (17.0%). We observed no difference in 90-day relapse between the linezolid group and the SPT group (2.2% vs 4.4% respectively; P = .87). No statistically significant difference was observed in 30-day all-cause mortality between the linezolid group and the SPT group (2.2% vs 13.3%; P = .08). The median length of hospital stay after onset was 8 days in the linezolid group and 19 days in the SPT group (P < .01). No drug-related events leading to discontinuation were noted in the linezolid group.
Treatment of SAB in selected low-risk patients with an oral switch to linezolid between days 3 and 9 of treatment until completion yielded similar clinical outcomes as SPT, allowing earlier discharge from the hospital.
金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)患者在接受治疗的第 3 至 9 天,将标准的静脉治疗(SPT)转换为口服利奈唑胺是一种有前途的替代方案。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2017 年期间在西班牙一所大学医院就诊的所有成人 SAB 患者。我们比较了接受 SPT 治疗的患者和在治疗第 3 至 9 天转换为口服利奈唑胺的患者的疗效、安全性和住院时间,直至治疗完成。我们排除了复杂的 SAB 和骨关节炎感染。使用 K-最近邻算法进行倾向评分匹配,比例为 2:1。
经过倾向评分匹配后,我们纳入了利奈唑胺组的 45 例患者和 SPT 组的 90 例患者。SAB 的主要来源是导管相关(49.6%)、来源不明(20.0%)和皮肤软组织(17.0%)。我们未发现利奈唑胺组和 SPT 组 90 天复发率有差异(分别为 2.2%和 4.4%;P =.87)。利奈唑胺组和 SPT 组 30 天全因死亡率也无统计学差异(分别为 2.2%和 13.3%;P =.08)。利奈唑胺组发病后住院时间中位数为 8 天,SPT 组为 19 天(P <.01)。利奈唑胺组未发生与药物相关的停药事件。
在选择的低危患者中,在治疗第 3 至 9 天转换为口服利奈唑胺直至治疗完成,与 SPT 相比可获得相似的临床结果,从而更早出院。