Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;125(2):290-297. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31770. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
The outcome for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) remains poor. A previous Children's Oncology Group (COG) study (ARST0431) for patients with metastatic RMS produced no improvement in outcome using multiple cytotoxic agents in a dose-intensive manner. The authors report results from the subsequent COG study (ARST08P1), which evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of adding cixutumumab (insulin-like growth factor-1 monoclonal antibody) or temozolomide to the ARST0431 intensive chemotherapy backbone.
Two nonrandomized pilot studies were conducted in patients with metastatic RMS, initially to determine feasibility, and both pilots were expanded to assess efficacy. All patients received 54 weeks of chemotherapy, including vincristine/irinotecan, interval-compressed vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide/etoposide, and vincristine/dactinomycin/cyclophosphamide. In pilot 1, patients received intravenous cixutumumab (3, 6, or 9 mg/kg) once weekly throughout therapy. In pilot 2, patients received oral temozolomide (100 mg/m ) daily for 5 days with irinotecan. All patients received radiation to the primary tumor and to metastatic sites.
One hundred sixty-eight eligible patients were enrolled (97 on pilot 1 and 71 on pilot 2). Most patients were aged ≥10 years (73%), with alveolar histology (70%), and had bone and/or bone marrow metastases (59%). Toxicities observed in each pilot were similar to those reported on ARST0431. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the 3-year event-free survival rate was 16% (95% confidence interval, 7%-25%) with cixutumumab and 18% (95% confidence interval, 2%-35%) with temozolomide.
The addition of cixutumumab or temozolomide to intensive multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic RMS was safe and feasible. Neither agent improved outcome compared with the same chemotherapy that was used on ARST0431.
转移性横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)患者的预后仍然较差。先前一项针对转移性 RMS 患者的儿童肿瘤学组(COG)研究(ARST0431)表明,采用多种细胞毒性药物进行密集剂量治疗并未改善患者的预后。作者报告了随后的 COG 研究(ARST08P1)的结果,该研究评估了在 ARST0431 强化化疗基础上加用西妥昔单抗(胰岛素样生长因子-1 单克隆抗体)或替莫唑胺的可行性和疗效。
对转移性 RMS 患者进行了两项非随机试验研究,最初旨在确定可行性,两个试验研究均进行了扩展以评估疗效。所有患者接受 54 周的化疗,包括长春新碱/伊立替康、间隔压缩长春新碱/多柔比星/环磷酰胺与异环磷酰胺/依托泊苷交替使用,以及长春新碱/放线菌素 D/环磷酰胺。在试验 1 中,患者在整个治疗过程中每周接受静脉注射西妥昔单抗(3、6 或 9mg/kg)。在试验 2 中,患者接受口服替莫唑胺(100mg/m ),每天 5 天,同时给予伊立替康。所有患者均接受原发肿瘤和转移部位的放疗。
共纳入 168 例符合条件的患者(97 例入组试验 1,71 例入组试验 2)。大多数患者年龄≥10 岁(73%),组织学类型为肺泡型(70%),且有骨和/或骨髓转移(59%)。每个试验中观察到的毒性与 ARST0431 报道的毒性相似。中位随访 2.9 年后,西妥昔单抗组的 3 年无事件生存率为 16%(95%置信区间,7%-25%),替莫唑胺组为 18%(95%置信区间,2%-35%)。
在转移性 RMS 的强化多药化疗中加入西妥昔单抗或替莫唑胺是安全可行的。与 ARST0431 中使用的相同化疗相比,这两种药物均未改善患者的预后。