Spiegel Daphna Y, Chino Fumiko, Moss Haley, Havrilesky Laura J, Chino Junzo P
Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Brachytherapy. 2019 Jan-Feb;18(1):115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act called for expansion of Medicaid in 2014. As some states elected to expand Medicaid and others did not, the goal of this study was to determine the effect of Medicaid expansion on the insurance status at cancer diagnosis of brachytherapy patients.
Patients aged 19-64 years with breast, cervical, uterine, or prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy from 2011 to 2014 with known insurance status were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Fisher's exact test was used to test for associations of insurance status with expanded versus nonexpanded states. For multivariate analysis, a binomial logistic regression was performed, dichotomized to uninsured versus any insurance.
Fifteen thousand four hundred ninety-seven subjects met entry criteria. In the entire cohort, rates of uninsurance were higher in nonexpanded states at baseline (4.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.00001). With selective Medicaid expansion in 2014, expanded states had a reduction in uninsurance rates (2.9-1.8%, p = 0.026), whereas nonexpanded states had a nonsignificant increase in uninsurance (4.5-5.0%, p = 0.371). There was a reduction in uninsurance in expanded states in areas of highest poverty (2.9-1.1%, p = 0.0004) not seen in nonexpanded states. These associations remained significant on multivariate analysis (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.8, p < 0.00001).
Patients who received brachytherapy were less likely to be uninsured in states where Medicaid was expanded, particularly evident in regions with highest poverty levels. These results should help inform policy decisions and efforts to ensure that all patients have access to high quality treatments, such as brachytherapy.
《患者保护与平价医疗法案》要求在2014年扩大医疗补助计划。由于一些州选择扩大医疗补助计划而其他州没有,本研究的目的是确定医疗补助计划扩大对近距离放射治疗患者癌症诊断时保险状况的影响。
在监测、流行病学和最终结果登记处中识别出2011年至2014年接受近距离放射治疗、年龄在19 - 64岁且已知保险状况的乳腺癌、宫颈癌、子宫癌或前列腺癌患者。采用Fisher精确检验来检验保险状况与扩大计划州和未扩大计划州之间的关联。对于多变量分析,进行二项逻辑回归,分为未参保与有任何保险两类。
15497名受试者符合纳入标准。在整个队列中,基线时未扩大计划的州未参保率更高(4.5%对2.9%,p < 0.00001)。随着2014年选择性扩大医疗补助计划,扩大计划的州未参保率有所降低(2.9% - 1.8%,p = 0.026),而未扩大计划的州未参保率无显著增加(4.5% - 5.0%,p = 0.371)。在贫困程度最高的地区,扩大计划的州未参保率有所降低(2.9% - 1.1%,p = 0.0004),而未扩大计划的州未出现这种情况。这些关联在多变量分析中仍然显著(比值比2.2,95%置信区间1.8 - 2.8,p < 0.00001)。
在医疗补助计划扩大的州,接受近距离放射治疗的患者未参保的可能性较小,在贫困程度最高的地区尤为明显。这些结果应有助于为政策决策提供信息,并努力确保所有患者都能获得高质量的治疗,如近距离放射治疗。