Camarda Joseph A, Patel Angira, Carr Michael R, Young Luciana T
Division of Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E Chicago Avenue, Box 21, Chicago, IL, 60611-2991, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-2012-7. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
Quantification guidelines for pediatric echocardiograms were published in 2010 establishing consensus regarding standard measurements. However, a standard protocol for performance and analysis of pediatric echocardiograms was not defined. This study aims to identify practice variations among pediatric laboratories. A survey was sent to 85 North American pediatric laboratory directors. The survey included 29 questions assessing: demographics, methods of image acquisition, parameters routinely evaluated and reported, and methods used to assess chamber sizes, valves, and ventricular function. There were 47/85 (55%) responses; 83% were academic centers and 77% in an urban setting. Wide variations exist in acquisition method (clips versus sweeps) and color scale settings. The most commonly used methods for left ventricular (LV) function are M-mode shortening fraction, qualitative assessment, and Doppler Tissue Imaging. The most commonly used parameter for right ventricular function is qualitative. LV mass is routinely measured by the majority of centers with variations in methods of calculation. Conversely, while a minority measure left atrial volume, there is consensus regarding the preferred method. While multiple techniques exist for assessing valves, qualitative assessment is reported to be the preferred method. Despite quantification guidelines, there is a lack of uniformity in performance and analysis of pediatric echocardiograms. Further studies are needed to determine why variations exist and whether development of consensus guidelines might improve interpretation, consistency and quality of reports, patient care, and provide a standardized system allowing for comparative research among centers.
儿科超声心动图的量化指南于2010年发布,就标准测量达成了共识。然而,尚未定义儿科超声心动图检查和分析的标准方案。本研究旨在确定儿科实验室之间的实践差异。向85位北美儿科实验室主任发送了一份调查问卷。该调查包括29个问题,评估内容有:人口统计学、图像采集方法、常规评估和报告的参数,以及用于评估腔室大小、瓣膜和心室功能的方法。共收到47/85(55%)份回复;其中83%为学术中心,77%位于城市地区。采集方法(片段与扫描)和彩色标尺设置存在很大差异。评估左心室(LV)功能最常用的方法是M型缩短分数、定性评估和多普勒组织成像。评估右心室功能最常用的参数是定性参数。大多数中心常规测量LV质量,但计算方法存在差异。相反,虽然少数中心测量左心房容积,但对于首选方法存在共识。虽然有多种评估瓣膜的技术,但据报告定性评估是首选方法。尽管有量化指南,但儿科超声心动图的检查和分析仍缺乏一致性。需要进一步研究以确定差异存在的原因,以及制定共识指南是否可能改善报告的解读、一致性和质量、患者护理,并提供一个标准化系统,以便各中心之间进行比较研究。