Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory (M.J.V., S.B., U.B., S.K., A.C., S.C., A.K., S.S.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.
Department of Radiation Oncology (M.B., R.B.), Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006832. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006832.
Because of the widespread acceptance of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents as an effective treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis, it is common to encounter multimetal layer stent restenosis in the recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of such patients treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) in comparison with other percutaneous options.
We enrolled patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during the period between 2011 and 2015 for recurrent drug-eluting stents in-stent restenosis with at least 2 layers of stents at the lesion site. This analysis compared patients who underwent treatment with IVBT and those who did not (non-IVBT group). The primary end point measured was major adverse cardiac events defined as a composite of target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality at 12 months. Adjusted associations were measured using propensity score matching. A total of 328 percutaneous coronary intervention patients met the eligibility criteria, of which 197 patients received IVBT, and 131 patients underwent routine percutaneous intervention. The primary end point was significantly lower in patients undergoing IVBT (13.2% and 28.2%; P=0.01). A propensity score matching for risk factors of in-stent restenosis identified 182 patients. The advantages of IVBT with regard to 1-year major adverse cardiac events were confirmed in this matched cohort (13.2% and 30.8%; adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.18-0.73]; P<0.01).
In this analysis, IVBT led to significantly lower major adverse cardiac events in patients with multilayered drug-eluting stents restenosis when compared with other percutaneous options at 1-year follow-up.
由于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合药物洗脱支架被广泛接受为治疗支架内再狭窄的有效治疗策略,近年来,多层金属支架内再狭窄较为常见。本研究旨在评估与其他经皮治疗方法相比,接受血管内放射治疗(IVBT)的此类患者的临床结局。
我们纳入了 2011 年至 2015 年期间因病变部位至少有 2 层支架而接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复发性药物洗脱支架支架内再狭窄患者。该分析比较了接受 IVBT 治疗的患者和未接受 IVBT 治疗的患者(非-IVBT 组)。主要终点是 12 个月时主要不良心脏事件的发生率,定义为靶病变血运重建、心肌梗死和全因死亡率的复合终点。使用倾向评分匹配来衡量调整后的关联。共有 328 例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者符合入选标准,其中 197 例患者接受 IVBT,131 例患者接受常规经皮介入治疗。IVBT 组的主要终点显著降低(13.2%和 28.2%;P=0.01)。对支架内再狭窄危险因素进行倾向评分匹配后,确定了 182 例患者。在匹配队列中,IVBT 在 1 年时主要不良心脏事件的优势得到了证实(13.2%和 30.8%;调整后的危险比[95%可信区间]:0.37[0.18-0.73];P<0.01)。
在本分析中,与其他经皮治疗方法相比,IVBT 可显著降低多层药物洗脱支架内再狭窄患者的 1 年主要不良心脏事件发生率。