• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Role of Emergence in Genetically Informed Relationships Research: A Methodological Analysis.涌现性在基因关联关系研究中的作用:一项方法论分析
Behav Genet. 2019 Mar;49(2):211-220. doi: 10.1007/s10519-018-9934-y. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together.一项系统回顾性研究,共纳入了 13 项研究,旨在评估共同面对结直肠癌的夫妇的关系质量。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):13-21. doi: 10.1002/pon.4339. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Yours, mine, or ours? Dyadic sleep hygiene and associations with sleep quality, emotional distress, and conflict frequency in mixed-gender, bed-sharing couples.你的、我的、还是我们的?对偶睡眠卫生与混合性别、同床共枕夫妻睡眠质量、情绪困扰和冲突频率的关系。
J Sleep Res. 2024 May;33(3):e14047. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14047. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses.前列腺癌患者及其配偶的二元应对与焦虑、抑郁和关系满意度之间的横断面关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):120-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 13.
5
Female informant-reports of male romantic partners' alcohol problems predict escalations in dyadic conflict in heterosexual couples.女性报告男性伴侣的酒精问题预测异性伴侣之间的冲突升级。
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.034. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
The Dyadic Health Influence Model.二元健康影响模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Feb;26(1):3-34. doi: 10.1177/10888683211054897. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
7
A genetically informative analysis of the association between dyadic adjustment, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.对对偶调整、抑郁症状和焦虑症状之间的关联进行基因信息分析。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Sep;237:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.105. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
8
Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis.二元访谈分析的方法与结果。
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1642-55. doi: 10.1177/1049732310376520. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
9
A Dyadic Perspective on Coping and its Effects on Relationship Quality and Psychological Distress in Couples Living with Chronic Pain: A Longitudinal Study.夫妻应对方式及其对慢性疼痛患者婚姻质量和心理困扰影响的双重观点:一项纵向研究。
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):e102-e113. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz267.
10
Internalizing sexism within close relationships: Perceptions of intimate partners' benevolent sexism promote women's endorsement of benevolent sexism.在亲密关系中内化性别歧视:对亲密伴侣善意性别歧视的认知会促使女性认同善意性别歧视。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Feb;110(2):214-38. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000043.

本文引用的文献

1
Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals.从一项涉及 110 万人的教育程度全基因组关联研究中发现基因并进行多基因预测。
Nat Genet. 2018 Jul 23;50(8):1112-1121. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3.
2
A genetically informative analysis of the association between dyadic adjustment, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.对对偶调整、抑郁症状和焦虑症状之间的关联进行基因信息分析。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Sep;237:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.105. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
Social Support and Strain Across Close Relationships: A Twin Study.亲密关系中的社会支持与压力:一项双胞胎研究。
Behav Genet. 2018 May;48(3):173-186. doi: 10.1007/s10519-018-9899-x. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
4
Polygenic Risk Scores in Clinical Psychology: Bridging Genomic Risk to Individual Differences.多基因风险评分在临床心理学中的应用:连接基因组风险与个体差异。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018 May 7;14:119-157. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084847.
5
The Nature of Nurture: Using a Virtual-Parent Design to Test Parenting Effects on Children's Educational Attainment in Genotyped Families.后天培养的本质:利用虚拟父母设计测试基因分型家庭中养育方式对孩子学业成就的影响。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;21(2):73-83. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.11. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
The nature of nurture: Effects of parental genotypes.教养的本质:父母基因型的影响。
Science. 2018 Jan 26;359(6374):424-428. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6877.
7
Genetics, the Rearing Environment, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Divorce: A Swedish National Adoption Study.遗传学、养育环境与离婚的代际传递:瑞典全国收养研究。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):370-378. doi: 10.1177/0956797617734864. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
8
The social genome of friends and schoolmates in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health.《国家青少年到成年健康纵向研究》中朋友和校友的社会基因组。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 23;115(4):702-707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711803115. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Embracing polygenicity: a review of methods and tools for psychiatric genetics research.拥抱多基因性:精神遗传学研究方法和工具述评。
Psychol Med. 2018 May;48(7):1055-1067. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002318. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
10
Gene-environment interplay in the context of romantic relationships.浪漫关系背景下的基因-环境相互作用。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

涌现性在基因关联关系研究中的作用:一项方法论分析

The Role of Emergence in Genetically Informed Relationships Research: A Methodological Analysis.

作者信息

Salvatore Jessica E, Kendler Kenneth S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Behav Genet. 2019 Mar;49(2):211-220. doi: 10.1007/s10519-018-9934-y. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10519-018-9934-y
PMID:30357601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6420374/
Abstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of genetically informed research on relationships, with an emphasis on relationships among unrelated individuals (e.g., spouses). To date, research in this area has used traditional behavioral genetic frameworks to either partition the variance in relationship-related outcomes into genetic and environmental components, or to examine gene-environment interplay between relationship factors and other outcomes. However, this conventional approach is at odds with the long-standing understanding from the field of relationship science that both partners' characteristics matter when predicting shared outcomes-that is, outcomes that are emergent. We examine briefly the philosophical concept of emergence, and discuss ways to model dyadic outcomes in genetically informed relationships research. We also review the related topic of social genetic effects, which refer to the influence of a social partner's genotype on a proband's phenotype. A genetically informed dyadic perspective has potentially important consequences for our understanding of the pathways from genotype→shared or individual-level phenotypes, and more fully recognizes the complexity of how genetic and social/environmental factors come together to influence human behavior.

摘要

本文对关系的基因信息研究进行了批判性分析,重点关注非亲属个体(如配偶)之间的关系。迄今为止,该领域的研究使用传统行为遗传学框架,要么将关系相关结果的方差划分为遗传和环境成分,要么研究关系因素与其他结果之间的基因 - 环境相互作用。然而,这种传统方法与关系科学领域长期以来的理解不一致,即在预测共同结果(即涌现结果)时,双方的特征都很重要。我们简要考察了涌现的哲学概念,并讨论了在基因信息关系研究中对二元结果进行建模的方法。我们还回顾了社会遗传效应这一相关主题,它指的是社会伴侣的基因型对先证者表型的影响。从基因信息二元视角出发,对于我们理解从基因型到共享或个体水平表型的途径具有潜在的重要意义,并且更充分地认识到遗传和社会/环境因素共同影响人类行为的复杂性。