Ishikawa Rie, Mizuno Ju
Masui. 2016 Sep;65(9):937-942.
The most commonly utilized approaches to obtura- tor nerve block are the pubic approach and the inter- adductor approach. However, the pubic approach is difficult and extremely invasive because a needle must be inserted into the pelvis and there have been some cases of vascular puncture using the pubic approach. Moreover, some cases accompanied clinical signs of local anesthetic toxicity using both approaches. Thus, we devised and performed the inguinal approach, where the femoral artery and vein are shifted outward in the level of the inguinal crease and the needle is inserted vertically from the innerside of them using electric stimulation. However, we experienced some unsuccessful cases due to a single branch block, be- cause the obturator nerve is separated into the ante- rior and posterior branches at the level of the inguinal crease. Choquet reported a new inguinal approach that blocks both branches which is easy and useful because the frequency of the needle insertion is less ; the block performance time is shorter ; the success rate is higher ; and the pain and discomfort are less than that with the pubic approach.
闭孔神经阻滞最常用的方法是耻骨入路和内收肌入路。然而,耻骨入路操作困难且创伤极大,因为必须将针插入骨盆,且有一些使用耻骨入路导致血管穿刺的病例。此外,两种方法都有一些伴有局部麻醉药毒性临床体征的病例。因此,我们设计并实施了腹股沟入路,即在腹股沟皱襞水平将股动脉和静脉向外移位,然后使用电刺激从它们内侧垂直插入针。然而,由于闭孔神经在腹股沟皱襞水平分为前支和后支,我们经历了一些因单分支阻滞而失败的病例。肖凯报道了一种新的腹股沟入路,该方法可阻滞两支神经,简单且实用,因为进针次数少;阻滞操作时间短;成功率高;疼痛和不适比耻骨入路少。