Walsh Erinn K, Cook Anne E, O'Brien Edward J
1 Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
2 Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2282-2294. doi: 10.1177/1747021817740836. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
Fantasy-text is a genre in which events routinely violate rules we know to be true in the real world. In four experiments, we explored the inherent contradiction between unrealistic fictional events and general world knowledge (GWK) to examine these competing information sources within the context of an extended fantasy-narrative. Experiments 1a and 1b demonstrated that fantasy-unrelated inconsistencies caused disruption to comprehension despite an abundance of contextual support for real-world impossible events that violate GWK. Experiment 2a demonstrated that fantasy-related inconsistencies caused disruption when they occurred at the local level and the fantasy-context stood in direct opposition to the target sentence. However, Experiment 2b demonstrated that disruption can be initially eliminated when readers encountered fantasy-related violations at the global level, but delayed-processing difficulty occurred on the spillover sentence, downstream of the target sentence. All four experiments are discussed within the context of the RI-Val model.
奇幻文本是一种其事件常常违背我们所知的现实世界真实规则的体裁。在四项实验中,我们探究了不现实的虚构事件与一般世界知识(GWK)之间的内在矛盾,以在一个扩展的奇幻叙事背景下审视这些相互竞争的信息源。实验1a和1b表明,与奇幻无关的不一致性会干扰理解,尽管对于违反GWK的现实世界中不可能发生的事件有大量的语境支持。实验2a表明,与奇幻相关的不一致性在局部层面出现且奇幻语境与目标句子直接对立时会造成干扰。然而,实验2b表明,当读者在全局层面遇到与奇幻相关的违背情况时,干扰最初可以消除,但在目标句子下游的溢出句子上会出现延迟处理困难。所有四项实验都在RI-Val模型的背景下进行了讨论。