Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL.
Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001006.
The 30-day all-cause readmission for heart failure (HF) is a standard measure to evaluate hospital performance. A recent study found that a shorter period after discharge may be more indicative of hospital quality.
To compare risk factors for 7- versus 30-day readmission in patients with HF.
This is a retrospective cohort using the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.
Patients 65 years and older with Medicare coverage discharged after HF admission.
The 7- or 30-day all-cause readmissions were the outcomes of interest. HF-related readmissions were secondary outcomes. Covariates included patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and admission-related information. Hierarchical logistic regression evaluated the association between covariates and readmissions.
There were N=15,039 all-cause readmissions within 7 days after discharge and N=47,896 within 30 days. Surgical service was a risk factor for 30-day but not 7-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio=1.10, 95% confidence interval=1.05-1.16). Depression, rheumatoid arthritis, liver disease, drug abuse, lymphoma, and psychosis were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause readmission but not 7-day. Longer lengths of stay also had a higher likelihood of all-cause readmission within 30 days compared with 7 days. In contrast, smaller hospital bed size was associated with an increased risk of 7-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio=1.06, confidence interval=1.01-1.12) but not 30-day. Sensitivity analysis with using a 3-day readmission interval showed similar results.
Risk factors for hospital readmission are slightly different dependent on the measurement interval. In general, hospital-related factors were associated with shorter readmissions intervals while patient factors were more associated with longer intervals.
心力衰竭(HF)的 30 天全因再入院是评估医院绩效的标准指标。最近的一项研究发现,出院后较短的时间可能更能说明医院的质量。
比较心力衰竭患者 7 天和 30 天再入院的危险因素。
这是一项使用 2014 年全国再入院数据库的回顾性队列研究。
年龄在 65 岁及以上、有医疗保险的 HF 出院患者。
7 天或 30 天全因再入院是本研究的主要结局。HF 相关再入院是次要结局。协变量包括患者特征、医院特征和入院相关信息。分层逻辑回归评估了协变量与再入院之间的关系。
出院后 7 天内共有 15039 例全因再入院,30 天内共有 47896 例。手术服务是 30 天但不是 7 天全因再入院的危险因素(比值比=1.10,95%置信区间=1.05-1.16)。抑郁、类风湿性关节炎、肝病、药物滥用、淋巴瘤和精神病与 30 天全因再入院风险增加相关,但与 7 天再入院无关。较长的住院时间也与 30 天内全因再入院的可能性增加相关,而与 7 天内再入院无关。相比之下,较小的医院床位数与 7 天全因再入院的风险增加相关(比值比=1.06,置信区间=1.01-1.12),但与 30 天全因再入院无关。使用 3 天再入院间隔的敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。
再入院的危险因素在一定程度上取决于测量间隔。一般来说,医院相关因素与较短的再入院间隔相关,而患者因素与较长的间隔相关。