Suppr超能文献

利用全国再入院数据库研究心力衰竭患者 7 天与 30 天再入院相关的风险因素。

Risk Factors Associated With 7- Versus 30-Day Readmission Among Patients With Heart Failure Using the Nationwide Readmission Database.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL.

出版信息

Med Care. 2019 Jan;57(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 30-day all-cause readmission for heart failure (HF) is a standard measure to evaluate hospital performance. A recent study found that a shorter period after discharge may be more indicative of hospital quality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare risk factors for 7- versus 30-day readmission in patients with HF.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort using the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.

SUBJECTS

Patients 65 years and older with Medicare coverage discharged after HF admission.

MEASURES

The 7- or 30-day all-cause readmissions were the outcomes of interest. HF-related readmissions were secondary outcomes. Covariates included patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and admission-related information. Hierarchical logistic regression evaluated the association between covariates and readmissions.

RESULTS

There were N=15,039 all-cause readmissions within 7 days after discharge and N=47,896 within 30 days. Surgical service was a risk factor for 30-day but not 7-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio=1.10, 95% confidence interval=1.05-1.16). Depression, rheumatoid arthritis, liver disease, drug abuse, lymphoma, and psychosis were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause readmission but not 7-day. Longer lengths of stay also had a higher likelihood of all-cause readmission within 30 days compared with 7 days. In contrast, smaller hospital bed size was associated with an increased risk of 7-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio=1.06, confidence interval=1.01-1.12) but not 30-day. Sensitivity analysis with using a 3-day readmission interval showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for hospital readmission are slightly different dependent on the measurement interval. In general, hospital-related factors were associated with shorter readmissions intervals while patient factors were more associated with longer intervals.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭(HF)的 30 天全因再入院是评估医院绩效的标准指标。最近的一项研究发现,出院后较短的时间可能更能说明医院的质量。

目的

比较心力衰竭患者 7 天和 30 天再入院的危险因素。

设计

这是一项使用 2014 年全国再入院数据库的回顾性队列研究。

受试者

年龄在 65 岁及以上、有医疗保险的 HF 出院患者。

测量方法

7 天或 30 天全因再入院是本研究的主要结局。HF 相关再入院是次要结局。协变量包括患者特征、医院特征和入院相关信息。分层逻辑回归评估了协变量与再入院之间的关系。

结果

出院后 7 天内共有 15039 例全因再入院,30 天内共有 47896 例。手术服务是 30 天但不是 7 天全因再入院的危险因素(比值比=1.10,95%置信区间=1.05-1.16)。抑郁、类风湿性关节炎、肝病、药物滥用、淋巴瘤和精神病与 30 天全因再入院风险增加相关,但与 7 天再入院无关。较长的住院时间也与 30 天内全因再入院的可能性增加相关,而与 7 天内再入院无关。相比之下,较小的医院床位数与 7 天全因再入院的风险增加相关(比值比=1.06,置信区间=1.01-1.12),但与 30 天全因再入院无关。使用 3 天再入院间隔的敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。

结论

再入院的危险因素在一定程度上取决于测量间隔。一般来说,医院相关因素与较短的再入院间隔相关,而患者因素与较长的间隔相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验