Suppr超能文献

随机Ⅱ期研究:S-1 二线化疗在晚期胰腺癌中连续日与交替日治疗的比较。

Randomized Phase II Study of Consecutive-Day versus Alternate-Day Treatment with S-1 as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Japan.

出版信息

Oncology. 2019;96(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000492388. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alternate-day administration of S-1 as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer in a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

METHODS

Patients with histologically proven, unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy not including S-1 as first-line therapy were randomly assigned to receive either daily or alternate-day treatment with S-1. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were enrolled, of which 75 were included in the final analysis. The median OS was 4.5 months in the daily group and 4.4 months in the alternate-day group (HR 1.178; 95% CI 0.741-1.875), with no significance in PFS and TTF. The response rate was 2.8% in the daily group and 0% in the alternate-day group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred with significantly higher incidence in the daily group (47.2 vs. 25.6%, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

As a second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer, although the efficacy in both groups was comparable and we can expect fewer toxicities with alternate-day administration of S-1, the noninferiority of alternate-day treatment to daily treatment with S-1 was not verified.

摘要

目的

在一项多中心、随机、Ⅱ期研究中,评估 S-1 隔日给药作为不可切除胰腺癌二线化疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

接受过不含 S-1 的一线化疗治疗、经组织学证实的不可切除胰腺癌患者,被随机分配接受 S-1 每日或隔日治疗。主要终点为总生存期(OS),次要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)、治疗失败时间(TTF)、缓解率和不良事件。

结果

共纳入 77 例患者,其中 75 例纳入最终分析。每日组的中位 OS 为 4.5 个月,隔日组为 4.4 个月(HR 1.178;95%CI 0.741-1.875),PFS 和 TTF 无显著差异。每日组的缓解率为 2.8%,隔日组为 0%。每日组的 3 级或更高不良事件发生率显著更高(47.2%比 25.6%,p = 0.044)。

结论

作为不可切除胰腺癌的二线化疗,虽然两组的疗效相当,并且我们可以预期 S-1 隔日给药的毒性更低,但 S-1 隔日治疗的非劣效性未得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验