Suppr超能文献

日本和英国降低耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的国家策略比较。

Comparison of national strategies to reduce meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Japan and England.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Kyoto University, Japan.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2018 Nov;100(3):280-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National responses to healthcare-associated infections vary between high-income countries, but, when analysed for contextual comparability, interventions can be assessed for transferability.

AIM

To identify learning from country-level approaches to addressing meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Japan and England.

METHODS

A longitudinal analysis (2000-2017), comparing epidemiological trends and policy interventions. Data from 441 textual sources concerning infection prevention and control (IPC), surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship interventions were systematically coded for: (a) type: mandatory requirements, recommendations, or national campaigns; (b) method: restrictive, persuasive, structural in nature; (c) level of implementation: macro (national), meso (organizational), micro (individual) levels. Healthcare organizational structures and role of media were also assessed.

FINDINGS

In England significant reduction has been achieved in number of reported MRSA bloodstream infections. In Japan, in spite of reductions, MRSA remains a predominant infection. Both countries face new threats in the emergence of drug-resistant Escherichia coli. England has focused on national mandatory and structural interventions, supported by a combination of outcomes-based incentives and punitive mechanisms, and multi-disciplinary IPC hospital teams. Japan has focused on (non-mandatory) recommendations and primarily persuasive interventions, supported by process-based incentives, with voluntary surveillance. Areas for development in Japan include resourcing of dedicated data management support and implementation of national campaigns for healthcare professionals and the public.

CONCLUSION

Policy interventions need to be relevant to local epidemiological trends, while acceptable within the health system, culture, and public expectations. Cross-national learning can help inform the right mix of interventions to create sustainable and resilient systems for future infection and economic challenges.

摘要

背景

高收入国家之间的医疗保健相关感染的国家应对措施各不相同,但是在进行背景可比性分析时,可以评估干预措施的可转移性。

目的

确定日本和英国在解决耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)方面的国家方法中可以借鉴的经验。

方法

对 2000 年至 2017 年的纵向分析,比较流行病学趋势和政策干预措施。从 441 个有关感染预防和控制(IPC)、监测和抗菌药物管理干预措施的文本来源中系统地收集数据,以进行以下编码:(a)类型:强制性要求、建议或国家运动;(b)方法:具有限制、说服和结构性;(c)实施水平:宏观(国家)、中观(组织)、微观(个人)层面。还评估了医疗保健组织结构和媒体的作用。

结果

在英国,报告的 MRSA 血流感染数量显著减少。在日本,尽管有所减少,但 MRSA 仍然是主要感染。两国都面临着新的耐药性大肠杆菌感染的威胁。英国侧重于国家强制性和结构性干预措施,这些措施得到了基于结果的激励措施和惩罚机制以及多学科 IPC 医院团队的支持。日本侧重于(非强制性)建议和主要的说服性干预措施,这些措施得到了基于过程的激励措施的支持,同时还有自愿监测。日本需要发展的领域包括为专门的数据管理支持提供资源以及为医疗保健专业人员和公众实施国家运动。

结论

政策干预措施必须与当地的流行病学趋势相关,同时要在卫生系统、文化和公众期望范围内可接受。跨国学习可以帮助确定适当的干预措施组合,为未来的感染和经济挑战创建可持续和有弹性的系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验