• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类替代性试错可预测空间导航表现。

Human Vicarious Trial and Error Is Predictive of Spatial Navigation Performance.

作者信息

Santos-Pata Diogo, Verschure Paul F M J

机构信息

SPECS: The Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems Group, Barcelona, Spain.

Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 12;12:237. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00237. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00237
PMID:30369873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6195106/
Abstract

When learning new environments, rats often pause at decision points and look back and forth over their possible trajectories as if they were imagining the future outcome of their actions, a behavior termed "Vicarious trial and error" (VTE). As the animal learns the environmental configuration, rats change from deliberative to habitual behavior, and VTE tends to disappear, suggesting a functional relevance in the early stages of learning. Despite the extensive research on spatial navigation, learning and VTE in the rat model, fewer studies have focused on humans. Here, we tested whether head-scanning behaviors that humans typically exhibit during spatial navigation are as predictive of spatial learning as in the rat. Subjects performed a goal-oriented virtual navigation task in a symmetric environment. Spatial learning was assessed through the analysis of trajectories, timings, and head orientations, under habitual and deliberative spatial navigation conditions. As expected, we found that trajectory length and duration decreased with the trial number, implying that subjects learned the spatial configuration of the environment over trials. Interestingly, IdPhi (a standard metric of VTE) also decreased with the trial number, suggesting that humans benefit from the same head-orientation scanning behavior as rats at spatial decision-points. Moreover, IdPhi captured exclusively at the first decision-point of each trial, was correlated with trial trajectory duration and length. Our findings demonstrate that in VTE is a signature of the stage of spatial learning in humans, and can be used to predict performance in navigation tasks with high accuracy.

摘要

在学习新环境时,大鼠常常会在决策点停顿,来回审视它们可能的行动轨迹,就好像它们在想象自己行动的未来结果一样,这种行为被称为“替代性试错”(VTE)。随着动物了解环境布局,大鼠从深思熟虑的行为转变为习惯性行为,VTE往往会消失,这表明它在学习的早期阶段具有功能相关性。尽管对大鼠模型中的空间导航、学习和VTE进行了广泛研究,但针对人类的研究较少。在这里,我们测试了人类在空间导航过程中通常表现出的头部扫描行为是否与大鼠一样能预测空间学习。受试者在一个对称环境中执行一项目标导向的虚拟导航任务。在习惯性和深思熟虑的空间导航条件下,通过分析轨迹、时间和头部方向来评估空间学习。正如预期的那样,我们发现轨迹长度和持续时间随着试验次数的增加而减少,这意味着受试者在多次试验中了解了环境的空间布局。有趣的是,IdPhi(VTE的一个标准指标)也随着试验次数的增加而减少,这表明人类在空间决策点受益于与大鼠相同的头部方向扫描行为。此外,仅在每次试验的第一个决策点捕获的IdPhi与试验轨迹的持续时间和长度相关。我们的研究结果表明,VTE是人类空间学习阶段的一个标志,并且可以高精度地用于预测导航任务中的表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/a72746f5a50e/fnbeh-12-00237-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/2ef09f6a9515/fnbeh-12-00237-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/da209495a49c/fnbeh-12-00237-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/8bbbf31c2a49/fnbeh-12-00237-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/cd8f04294199/fnbeh-12-00237-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/4ec61f0911c5/fnbeh-12-00237-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/a72746f5a50e/fnbeh-12-00237-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/2ef09f6a9515/fnbeh-12-00237-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/da209495a49c/fnbeh-12-00237-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/8bbbf31c2a49/fnbeh-12-00237-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/cd8f04294199/fnbeh-12-00237-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/4ec61f0911c5/fnbeh-12-00237-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6195106/a72746f5a50e/fnbeh-12-00237-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Human Vicarious Trial and Error Is Predictive of Spatial Navigation Performance.人类替代性试错可预测空间导航表现。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 12;12:237. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00237. eCollection 2018.
2
Conflict between place and response navigation strategies: effects on vicarious trial and error (VTE) behaviors.位置导航策略和反应导航策略的冲突:对替代性试错行为的影响。
Learn Mem. 2013 Feb 15;20(3):130-8. doi: 10.1101/lm.028753.112.
3
Flexible decision-making is related to strategy learning, vicarious trial and error, and medial prefrontal rhythms during spatial set-shifting.灵活决策与策略学习、替代试错以及空间定势转换期间的内侧前额叶节律有关。
Learn Mem. 2024 Jul 22;31(7). doi: 10.1101/lm.053911.123. Print 2024 Jul.
4
The neural substrates of deliberative decision making: contrasting effects of hippocampus lesions on performance and vicarious trial-and-error behavior in a spatial memory task and a visual discrimination task.审慎决策的神经基础:海马体损伤对空间记忆任务和视觉辨别任务中的表现及替代性试错行为的对比影响。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Oct 30;6:70. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00070. eCollection 2012.
5
Vicarious Trial-and-Error Is Enhanced During Deliberation in Human Virtual Navigation in a Translational Foraging Task.在一项转化觅食任务的人类虚拟导航审议过程中,替代性试错得到增强。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr 12;15:586159. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.586159. eCollection 2021.
6
Noradrenergic signaling in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala differentially regulates vicarious trial-and-error in a spatial decision-making task.内侧前额叶皮质和杏仁核中的去甲肾上腺素能信号在空间决策任务中对替代性试错进行差异性调节。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 15;297:104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
7
Noradrenergic modulation of vicarious trial-and-error behavior during a spatial decision-making task in rats.大鼠空间决策任务中去甲肾上腺素能对替代性试错行为的调节作用。
Neuroscience. 2014 Apr 18;265:291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
8
Stress drives deliberative tendencies by influencing vicarious trial and error in decision making.压力通过影响决策中的替代性试错来驱动深思熟虑的倾向。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Oct;174:107276. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107276. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Pausing and reorienting behaviors enhance the performance of a spatial working memory task.停顿和重新定向行为可提高空间工作记忆任务的表现。
Behav Brain Res. 2023 May 28;446:114410. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114410. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
10
Vicarious trial and error.替代性试错。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Mar;17(3):147-59. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2015.30.

引用本文的文献

1
Flexible decision-making is related to strategy learning, vicarious trial and error, and medial prefrontal rhythms during spatial set-shifting.灵活决策与策略学习、替代试错以及空间定势转换期间的内侧前额叶节律有关。
Learn Mem. 2024 Jul 22;31(7). doi: 10.1101/lm.053911.123. Print 2024 Jul.
2
Endotaxis: A neuromorphic algorithm for mapping, goal-learning, navigation, and patrolling.内定向:一种用于映射、目标学习、导航和巡逻的神经形态算法。
Elife. 2024 Feb 29;12:RP84141. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84141.
3
Humans account for cognitive costs when finding shortcuts: An information-theoretic analysis of navigation.

本文引用的文献

1
Vicarious trial and error.替代性试错。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Mar;17(3):147-59. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2015.30.
2
Grid Cells and Place Cells: An Integrated View of their Navigational and Memory Function.网格细胞与位置细胞:关于其导航和记忆功能的综合观点
Trends Neurosci. 2015 Dec;38(12):763-775. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
3
Using Grid Cells for Navigation.利用网格细胞进行导航。
人类在寻找捷径时会考虑认知成本:对导航的信息论分析。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jan 6;19(1):e1010829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010829. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
The ventral midline thalamus coordinates prefrontal-hippocampal neural synchrony during vicarious trial and error.腹侧中线丘脑在替代性试错过程中协调前额叶-海马体的神经同步性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 29;12(1):10940. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14707-8.
5
A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Vicarious Trial and Error Behaviors.一种用于检测替代性试错行为的机器学习方法。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 7;15:676779. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.676779. eCollection 2021.
6
Vicarious Trial-and-Error Is Enhanced During Deliberation in Human Virtual Navigation in a Translational Foraging Task.在一项转化觅食任务的人类虚拟导航审议过程中,替代性试错得到增强。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr 12;15:586159. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.586159. eCollection 2021.
Neuron. 2015 Aug 5;87(3):507-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.006.
4
Hippocampus, delay discounting, and vicarious trial-and-error.海马体、延迟折扣和替代性试错。
Hippocampus. 2015 May;25(5):643-54. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22400. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
5
Attentive scanning behavior drives one-trial potentiation of hippocampal place fields.注意扫描行为驱动海马体位置场的单次强化。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):725-31. doi: 10.1038/nn.3687. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
6
Conflict between place and response navigation strategies: effects on vicarious trial and error (VTE) behaviors.位置导航策略和反应导航策略的冲突:对替代性试错行为的影响。
Learn Mem. 2013 Feb 15;20(3):130-8. doi: 10.1101/lm.028753.112.
7
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.多选项漂移扩散模型预测了基于价值的决策中视觉注视点与选择之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
8
Spontaneous revisitation during visual exploration as a link among strategic behavior, learning, and the hippocampus.视觉探索中的自发重访现象:策略行为、学习与海马体之间的联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):E402-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100225108. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
Cognitive maps in rats and men.大鼠和人类的认知地图。
Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208. doi: 10.1037/h0061626.
10
Neural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point.CA3区的神经集群在决策点处短暂编码动物前方的路径。
J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 7;27(45):12176-89. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3761-07.2007.