Kluft Nick, Bruijn Sjoerd M, van Dieën Jaap H, Pijnappels Mirjam
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 12;9:1419. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01419. eCollection 2018.
Selecting motor strategies in daily life tasks requires a perception of the task requirements as well as of one's own physical abilities. Age-related cognitive and physical changes may affect these perceptions. This might entail that some older adults select inappropriate movement strategies when confronted with daily-life motor tasks, which could lead to balance loss or falls. We investigated whether older adults select motor strategies in accordance with their actual physical ability. Twenty-one older adults were subjected to a stepping down paradigm, in which full-body kinematics of selected and reactive behavior were recorded. Stepping down from a curb can be done with either (1) a relatively low effort but more balance threatening heel landing, or (2) a more controlled but more demanding toe landing. The probability of selecting a toe landing grows with an increase in curb height. We determined the curb height at which participants switched from heel to toe landing during expected stepping down over different heights as an indicator of their perceived ability. During an unexpected step down trial, participants encountered a step down of 0.1 m earlier than expected, because part of the walkway was removed and covered by a black cloth. We evaluated participants' actual physical ability from the reactive behavior, with performance defined as the reduction in kinetic energy between the peak value after landing and the onset of the next step. To unravel whether the selected motor strategies corresponded with actual physical ability, the ability to recover from the unexpected step down was correlated to the height at which the participants switched movement strategy. The switching height was not correlated to the ability to recover from an unexpected step down (ρ = 0.034, = 0.877). This finding suggests that older adults do not select their movement strategy in stepping down based on their actual abilities, or have an imprecise perception of their actual abilities. Future research should evaluate whether inappropriate motor strategy selection in a stepping down paradigm can explain accidental falls in older adults.
在日常生活任务中选择运动策略需要对任务要求以及自身身体能力有一定的认知。与年龄相关的认知和身体变化可能会影响这些认知。这可能意味着一些老年人在面对日常生活中的运动任务时会选择不适当的运动策略,从而导致平衡丧失或跌倒。我们研究了老年人是否根据其实际身体能力来选择运动策略。21名老年人参与了一个下台阶范式实验,实验中记录了所选行为和反应行为的全身运动学数据。从路边台阶往下走可以采用以下两种方式之一:(1)相对省力但对平衡威胁较大的脚跟先着地方式,或者(2)更可控但要求更高的脚尖先着地方式。随着台阶高度的增加,选择脚尖先着地的概率也会增加。我们将参与者在不同高度的预期下台阶过程中从脚跟先着地转换为脚尖先着地时的台阶高度确定为其感知能力的一个指标。在一次意外下台阶试验中,参与者比预期提前遇到了0.1米的台阶下降,因为部分人行道被移除并用黑布覆盖。我们根据反应行为评估了参与者的实际身体能力,表现定义为着地后峰值动能与下一步开始之间的动能减少量。为了弄清楚所选的运动策略是否与实际身体能力相符,将从意外下台阶中恢复的能力与参与者转换运动策略的高度进行了相关性分析。转换高度与从意外下台阶中恢复的能力不相关(ρ = 0.034,P = 0.877)。这一发现表明,老年人在下台阶时并非根据其实际能力来选择运动策略,或者对自己的实际能力感知不准确。未来的研究应该评估在台阶下降范式中不适当的运动策略选择是否能够解释老年人的意外跌倒。