Zhang Zhenrong, Feng Hongxiang, Xiao Fei, Liu Deruo
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Sep;6(18):359. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.35.
This study aims to compare perioperative and oncologic efficacy of limited resection with lobectomy in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients ≥75 years old.
A systemic search of database including PubMed, OVID and Cochrane was carried out to identify the potential relevant studies published. Data extracted were analyzed with Revman 5.1.
5,304 citations were identified by the electronically search. A total of 3,461 patients were included, of whom 1,323 received limited resection and 2,139 received lobectomy. There was higher postoperative complication ratio after lobectomy (32.93% 23.87%, RR =0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.93; P=0.01). There were similar total recurrent (18.56%, RR =1.15; 95% CI, 0.82-1.61; P=0.43), and distant recurrent ratio (16.17%, RR =0.67; 95% CI, 0.43-1.05; P=0.08) between groups. Lower local-regional recurrent ratio (2.40%, RR =4.31; 95% CI, 1.98-9.39; P<0.001) was observed after lobectomy. Compared with lobectomy, patients received limited resection showed poorer overall survival (HR =1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.44; P=0.004) and lung cancer specific survival (HR =1.37; 95% CI, 1.14-1.64; P<0.001).
This analysis showed superior lung cancer specific survival, and overall survival after lobectomy over limited resection for clinical stage I NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years old. Our results confirmed that lobectomy should be considered in aged patients if tolerable.
本研究旨在比较肺叶切除术与局限性切除术对年龄≥75岁的临床I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者围手术期及肿瘤学疗效。
系统检索包括PubMed、OVID和Cochrane在内的数据库,以识别已发表的潜在相关研究。提取的数据采用Revman 5.1进行分析。
通过电子检索识别出5304篇文献。共纳入3461例患者,其中1323例接受局限性切除术,2139例接受肺叶切除术。肺叶切除术后的术后并发症发生率更高(32.93%对23.87%,RR =0.71;95%CI,0.54 - 0.93;P =0.01)。两组间的总复发率(18.56%,RR =1.15;95%CI,0.82 - 1.61;P =0.43)和远处复发率(16.17%,RR =0.67;95%CI,0.43 - 1.05;P =0.08)相似。肺叶切除术后观察到较低的局部区域复发率(2.40%,RR =4.31;95%CI,1.98 - 9.39;P<0.001)。与肺叶切除术相比,接受局限性切除术的患者总生存期较差(HR =1.24;95%CI,1.07 - 1.44;P =0.004),肺癌特异性生存期也较差(HR =1.37;95%CI,1.14 - 1.64;P<0.001)。
该分析表明,对于年龄≥75岁的临床I期NSCLC患者,肺叶切除术的肺癌特异性生存期和总生存期优于局限性切除术。我们的结果证实,在年龄较大的患者中,如果耐受,应考虑行肺叶切除术。