Lu Weiqun, Zeng Xiang, Li Nan, Liu Haiying
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China.Email:
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1136-1141.
To explore the value of superior mesenteric vein (No.14v) lymph node dissection in D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced distal gastric cancer.
A retrospective cohort study was carried out. A total of 796 patients with locally advanced distal gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy at the Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University between 2002 and 2016 were enrolled.
locally advanced distal gastric adenocarcinoma confirmed by postoperative pathology; adenocarcinoma located at or invaded into lower 1/3 stomach; lymphadenectomy was D2 or D2+; negative resection margin confirmed by pathology; no distal metastasis was found; preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not administrated. Patients with undefined group of lymph nodes by postoperative pathology and those who were died perioperatively were excluded. Among 796 patients, 293 underwent No.14v dissection (No.14vD+ group) and the other 503 patients did not undergo No.14v dissection (No.14vD- group). The 5-year overall survival was compared between the two groups. Therapeutic index of No.14v lymph nodes was calculated according to the following formula: therapeutic index=metastatic rate of No.14 lymph nodes (%) × 5-year survival rate of patients with No.14 lymph node metastasis(%) × 100. Meanwhile, stratified analyses based on pathological TNM staging were performed.
There were no significant differences in age, gender, tumor size, Borrmann type, Lauren classification, histological type, surgical procedure, and number of harvested lymph node between two groups (all P>0.05). However, compared to No.14vD- group, No.14vD+ group had more advanced T staging (χ² =14.771, P=0.005) and TNM staging (χ² =18.339, P=0.003), and higher ratio of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (χ² =4.205, P=0.040). The median follow-up period was 47 months. The 5-year survival rate in No.14vD+ and No.14vD- groups was 57.4% and 46.8% respectively without statistically significant difference (P=0.313). After adjusting for confounding factors, Cox proportional hazards model showed that No.14v lymphadenectomy was not an independent prognostic factor(HR=0.802, 95%CI: 0.545-1.186, P=0.124). Stratified analyses revealed that in all TNM stages, 5-year survival rates were not significantly different between two groups (all P>0.05). However, No.14v lymphadenectomy showed a tendency of survival benefit when the tumor staging after advancing to III A stage(III A: P=0.103; III B: P=0.085; III C: P=0.060). Five-year survival rates of No.14vD+ and No.14vD- groups in stage III A were 54.9% and 45.2%, in III B stage were 39.8% and 29.5%, in III C stage were 27.5% and 16.2%, respectively. After combining III A, III B and III C, the No.14vD+ group had a higher 5-year survival rate than No.14vD- group (39.2% vs. 27.7%, P=0.006). The No.14v metastasis rate in No14v+ group was 12.6%(37/293), including 0%(0/46), 2.5%(1/40), 4.9%(2/41), 15.7%(8/51), 20.8%(11/53) and 24.2%(15/62) in stages I B, II A, II B, III A, III B and III C respectively. The metastasis rate of No.14v lymph node in stage III patients was 20.5%(34/166). The 5-year survival rate of these 34 stage III patients with No.14v metastasis was 21.1%. The therapeutic index of No.14v lymph node in stage III patients was 4.3, which was comparable with 3.9 of No.9 and 4.9 of No.11p, even higher than 2.6 of No.1.
Although No.14v lymphadenectomy can not improve the overall survival of patients with locally advanced distal gastric cancer, but it may significantly improve survival in those with stage III cancer. The therapeutic index of No.14v lymph node is similar to No.2 station lymph node in patients with stage III distal gastric cancer. Therefore No.14v lymph node should be included in D2 dissection.
探讨肠系膜上静脉(第14v组)淋巴结清扫在局部进展期远端胃癌D2根治性切除术中的价值。
进行一项回顾性队列研究。纳入2002年至2016年期间在广州医科大学癌症中心接受D2根治性切除术的796例局部进展期远端胃癌患者。
术后病理确诊为局部进展期远端胃腺癌;腺癌位于胃下1/3或侵犯胃下1/3;淋巴结清扫为D2或D2+;病理证实切缘阴性;未发现远处转移;未进行术前新辅助化疗。排除术后病理淋巴结分组不明确及围手术期死亡的患者。796例患者中,293例行第14v组淋巴结清扫(第14vD+组),另外503例患者未行第14v组淋巴结清扫(第14vD-组)。比较两组患者的5年总生存率。根据以下公式计算第14v组淋巴结的治疗指数:治疗指数=第14组淋巴结转移率(%)×第14组淋巴结转移患者的5年生存率(%)×100。同时,根据病理TNM分期进行分层分析。
两组患者在年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、Borrmann分型、Lauren分类、组织学类型、手术方式及清扫淋巴结数目等方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。然而,与第14vD-组相比,第14vD+组T分期(χ²=14.771,P=0.005)和TNM分期(χ²=18.339,P=0.003)更晚,接受辅助化疗的比例更高(χ²=4.205,P=0.040)。中位随访时间为47个月。第14vD+组和第14vD-组的5年生存率分别为57.4%和46.8%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.313)。校正混杂因素后,Cox比例风险模型显示第14v组淋巴结清扫不是独立的预后因素(HR=0.802,95%CI:0.545-1.186,P=0.124)。分层分析显示,在所有TNM分期中,两组患者的5年生存率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。然而,当肿瘤分期进展至ⅢA期时,第14v组淋巴结清扫显示出生存获益趋势(ⅢA期:P=0.103;ⅢB期:P=0.085;ⅢC期:P=0.060)。ⅢA期第14vD+组和第14vD-组的5年生存率分别为54.9%和45.2%,ⅢB期分别为39.8%和29.5%,ⅢC期分别为27.5%和16.2%。合并ⅢA、ⅢB和ⅢC期后,第14vD+组的5年生存率高于第14vD-组(39.2%对27.7%,P=0.006)。第14v+组中第14v组淋巴结转移率为12.6%(37/293),其中ⅠB期为0%(0/46),ⅡA期为2.5%(1/40),ⅡB期为4.9%(2/41),ⅢA期为15.7%(8/51),ⅢB期为20.8%(11/53),ⅢC期为24.2%(15/62)。Ⅲ期患者中第14v组淋巴结转移率为20.5%(34/166)。这34例Ⅲ期第14v组淋巴结转移患者的5年生存率为21.1%。Ⅲ期患者第14v组淋巴结的治疗指数为4.3,与第9组的3.9和第11p组的4.9相当,甚至高于第1组的2.6。
虽然第14v组淋巴结清扫不能提高局部进展期远端胃癌患者的总生存率,但可能显著提高Ⅲ期患者的生存率。Ⅲ期远端胃癌患者第14v组淋巴结的治疗指数与第2站淋巴结相似。因此,第14v组淋巴结应纳入D2清扫范围。