Suppr超能文献

阿替美唑相较于育亨宾在氯胺酮/二甲噻嗪麻醉中更快出现苏醒行为。

Faster emergence behavior from ketamine/xylazine anesthesia with atipamezole versus yohimbine.

机构信息

Atlanta VA Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America.

Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0199087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199087. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Recent interest in reversal of the hypnotic effects of anesthesia has mainly focused on overcoming a surge in GABA-mediated inhibitory signaling through activation of subcortical arousal circuits or antagonizing GABA receptors. Here we examine the reversal of anesthesia produced from non-GABA agents ketamine/xylazine and the effects of antagonists of adrenoreceptors. These antagonists vary in selectivity and produce temporally unique waking behavior post-anesthesia. We compared two antagonists with differential selectivity for α1- vs. α2-receptors, yohimbine (YOH, 1:40 selectivity) and atipamezole (ATI, 1:8500). Adult mice received intraperitoneal injections of either YOH (4.3 mg/kg), ATI (0.4 mg/kg), or saline after achieving sustained loss of righting following injection of ketamine/xylazine (ketamine: 65.0 mg/kg; xylazine: 9.9 mg/kg). Behaviors indicative of the post-anesthesia, re-animation sequence were carefully monitored and the timing of each behavior relative to anesthesia induction was compared. Both YOH and ATI hastened behaviors indicative of emergence, but ATI was faster than YOH to produce certain behaviors, including whisker movement (YOH: 21.9±1.5 min, ATI: 17.5±0.5 min, p = 0.004) and return of righting reflex (RORR) (YOH: 40.6±8.8 min, ATI: 26.0±1.2 min, p<0.001). Interestingly, although YOH administration hastened early behavioral markers of emergence relative to saline (whisking), the completion of the emergence sequence (time from first marker to appearance of RORR) was delayed with YOH. We attribute this effect to antagonism of α1 receptors by yohimbine. Also notable was the failure of either antagonist to hasten the re-establishment of coordinated motor behavior (e.g., attempts to remove adhesive tape on the forepaw placed during anesthesia) relative to the end of emergence (RORR). In total, our work suggests that in addition to pharmacokinetic effects, re-establishment of normal waking behaviors after anesthesia involves neuronal circuits dependent on time and/or activity.

摘要

最近,人们对逆转麻醉的催眠效应的兴趣主要集中在通过激活皮质下唤醒回路或拮抗 GABA 受体来克服 GABA 介导的抑制信号的激增上。在这里,我们研究了非 GABA 制剂氯胺酮/二甲噻嗪产生的麻醉逆转作用,以及肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂的作用。这些拮抗剂的选择性不同,在麻醉后产生暂时独特的清醒行为。我们比较了两种对α 1-和α 2-受体具有不同选择性的拮抗剂,育亨宾(YOH,1:40 选择性)和阿替美唑(ATI,1:8500)。成年小鼠在注射氯胺酮/二甲噻嗪(氯胺酮:65.0mg/kg;二甲噻嗪:9.9mg/kg)后,持续失去翻正反射,然后接受腹腔内注射 YOH(4.3mg/kg)、ATI(0.4mg/kg)或生理盐水。仔细监测了表明麻醉后再激活的行为,并比较了每种行为与麻醉诱导的时间关系。YOH 和 ATI 都加速了表明苏醒的行为,但 ATI 比 YOH 更快地产生某些行为,包括胡须运动(YOH:21.9±1.5 分钟,ATI:17.5±0.5 分钟,p=0.004)和翻正反射恢复(RORR)(YOH:40.6±8.8 分钟,ATI:26.0±1.2 分钟,p<0.001)。有趣的是,尽管 YOH 给药相对于盐水加速了早期苏醒的行为标记物(胡须摆动),但 YOH 组苏醒序列的完成(从第一个标记物到 RORR 出现的时间)被延迟。我们将这种效应归因于育亨宾对α 1 受体的拮抗作用。值得注意的是,两种拮抗剂都没有加速协调运动行为(例如,试图移除麻醉期间放置在前爪上的胶带)的重建相对于苏醒结束(RORR)。总的来说,我们的工作表明,除了药代动力学效应外,麻醉后正常觉醒行为的恢复还涉及到依赖时间和/或活动的神经元回路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/238b/6205597/09e4955acbb3/pone.0199087.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验