Bacquet Juliette, Stojkovic Tanya, Boyer Amandine, Martini Nathalie, Audic Frédérique, Chabrol Brigitte, Salort-Campana Emmanuelle, Delmont Emilien, Desvignes Jean-Pierre, Verschueren Annie, Attarian Shahram, Chaussenot Annabelle, Delague Valérie, Levy Nicolas, Bonello-Palot Nathalie
Département de génétique médicale, Hôpital Timone enfants, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Centre de référence des maladies neuromusculaires, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 28;8(10):e021632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021632.
Inherited peripheral neuropathies (IPN) represent a large heterogenous group of hereditary diseases with more than 100 causative genes reported to date. In this context, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers the opportunity to screen all these genes with high efficiency in order to unravel the genetic basis of the disease. Here, we compare the diagnostic yield of targeted NGS with our previous gene by gene Sanger sequencing strategy. We also describe several novel likely pathogenic variants.
We have completed the targeted NGS of 81 IPN genes in a cohort of 123 unrelated patients affected with diverse forms of IPNs, mostly Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT): 23% CMT1, 52% CMT2, 9% distal hereditary motor neuropathy, 7% hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy and 6.5% intermediate CMT.
We have solved the molecular diagnosis in 49 of 123 patients (~40%). Among the identified variants, 26 variants were already reported in the literature. In our cohort, the most frequently mutated genes are respectively: , , , , , and . Panel-based NGS was more efficient in familial cases than in sporadic cases (diagnostic yield 49%vs19%, respectively). NGS-based search for copy number variations, allowed the identification of three duplications in three patients and raised the diagnostic yield to 41%. This yield is two times higher than the one obtained previously by gene Sanger sequencing screening. The impact of panel-based NGS screening is particularly important for demyelinating CMT (CMT1) subtypes, for which the success rate reached 87% (36% only for axonal CMT2).
NGS allowed to identify causal mutations in a shorter and cost-effective time. Actually, targeted NGS is a well-suited strategy for efficient molecular diagnosis of IPNs. However, NGS leads to the identification of numerous variants of unknown significance, which interpretation requires interdisciplinary collaborations between molecular geneticists, clinicians and (neuro)pathologists.
遗传性周围神经病(IPN)是一大类异质性遗传性疾病,迄今为止已报道了100多个致病基因。在此背景下,靶向新一代测序(NGS)提供了高效筛查所有这些基因的机会,以揭示疾病的遗传基础。在此,我们比较了靶向NGS与我们之前逐个基因的桑格测序策略的诊断效率。我们还描述了几种新的可能致病的变异。
我们对123例患有多种形式IPN的无关患者进行了81个IPN基因的靶向NGS检测,这些患者大多患有夏科 - 马里 - 图斯病(CMT):23%为CMT1型,52%为CMT2型,9%为远端遗传性运动神经病,7%为遗传性感觉和自主神经病,6.5%为中间型CMT。
我们在123例患者中的49例(约40%)中解决了分子诊断问题。在鉴定出的变异中,26个变异已在文献中报道。在我们的队列中,最常发生突变的基因分别是: , , , , , 和 。基于面板的NGS在家族性病例中比在散发性病例中更有效(诊断效率分别为49%对19%)。基于NGS的拷贝数变异搜索,在三名患者中鉴定出三个重复,并将诊断效率提高到41%。这一效率比之前通过基因桑格测序筛查获得的效率高出两倍。基于面板的NGS筛查对脱髓鞘性CMT(CMT1)亚型的影响尤为重要,其成功率达到87%(轴索性CMT2仅为36%)。
NGS能够在更短的时间和更具成本效益的情况下鉴定出致病突变。实际上,靶向NGS是IPN高效分子诊断的一种合适策略。然而,NGS导致鉴定出许多意义不明的变异,对这些变异的解读需要分子遗传学家、临床医生和(神经)病理学家之间的跨学科合作。