Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, 611 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Am J Bot. 2018 Nov;105(11):1835-1846. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1182. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
Plants often interact simultaneously with multiple antagonists and mutualists that can alter plant traits at the phenotypic or genetic level, subsequent plant-insect interactions, and reproduction. Although many studies have examined the effects of single floral antagonisms on subsequent pollination and plant reproduction, we know very little about the combined, potentially non-additive effects of multiple flower-insect interactions.
We simulated increased florivory, nectar robbing, and pollination on field-grown Impatiens capensis, which allowed us to determine interactive effects on five subsequent plant-insect interactions and 16 plant traits, including traits related to plant growth, floral attractiveness, floral defenses, and plant reproduction.
All three manipulative treatments had significant non-additive effects on the behavior of subsequent floral visitors, indicating that the effect of floral visitors generally depended on the presence or behavior of others. Pollination increased visitation by both pollinators and nectar larcenists (robbers and thieves), while florivory reduced pollinator and larcenist visits. Surprisingly, supplemental pollination also increased leaf herbivory. Florivores often responded to manipulations in opposite ways than did nectar larcenists and pollinators, suggesting different mechanisms influencing visitors that consume nectar compared to floral tissue. While our treatments did not affect any floral trait measured, they non-additively impacted plant reproduction, with florivory having a larger overall impact than either nectar robbing or pollination.
These results emphasize the importance of understanding the context in which flower-insect interactions occur because the composition of the interacting community can have large and non-additive impacts on subsequent insect behavior and plant reproduction.
植物通常会同时与多种拮抗剂和互惠共生体相互作用,这些相互作用可以在表型或遗传水平上改变植物的特征,随后影响植物与昆虫的相互作用和繁殖。尽管许多研究已经研究了单一花卉拮抗作用对随后传粉和植物繁殖的影响,但我们对多种花-虫相互作用的综合、潜在非加性影响知之甚少。
我们在野外生长的凤仙花上模拟增加花食性、花蜜掠夺和传粉,这使我们能够确定对随后的五种植物-昆虫相互作用和 16 种植物特征的相互作用影响,包括与植物生长、花吸引力、花防御和植物繁殖相关的特征。
所有三种操纵处理对随后的花访客的行为都有显著的非加性影响,表明花访客的效果通常取决于其他访客的存在或行为。传粉增加了传粉者和花蜜掠夺者(掠夺者和小偷)的访问量,而花食性减少了传粉者和掠夺者的访问量。令人惊讶的是,补充传粉也增加了叶片食草动物的数量。花食者的反应通常与花蜜掠夺者和传粉者相反,这表明影响消耗花蜜的访客的机制与影响消耗花卉组织的访客的机制不同。虽然我们的处理没有影响到任何测量的花卉特征,但它们对植物繁殖有非加性影响,花食性的整体影响大于花蜜掠夺或传粉。
这些结果强调了理解花-虫相互作用发生的背景的重要性,因为相互作用的群落组成可能对随后的昆虫行为和植物繁殖产生大的、非加性的影响。