a Sports Medicine Center , Diputacion de Toledo , Toledo , Spain.
b Exercise Physiology Lab at Toledo , University of Castilla-La Mancha , Toledo , Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 May;19(4):549-556. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1540659. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
The aim of the present study was to study if training intensity relative to ventilatory thresholds (VTs) determines the improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in middle-aged sedentary individuals with obesity. Before and after 16-weeks of HIIT (43-min alternating bouts at 70/90% of HR), oxygen consumption ( O) and heart rate (HR) at ventilatory threshold 1 ( O HR), ventilatory threshold 2 ( O, HR) and at maximal effort ( O, HR) were assessed during a graded cycle-ergometer exercise test. Retrospectively, participants were divided into two groups based on whether training intensities were under (UNDER; n = 39) or over (OVER; n = 37) VT and VT. At baseline, age, body composition, O O, and HR were similar in both groups. However, O was higher in OVER (P = 0.033), whereas HR and HR were higher in UNDER (P < 0.05). O (9.0%) and HR (2.2%) improved similarly in both groups. O and O improved with training in both groups (P < 0.001) but the improvement was larger in OVER versus UNDER in O (P = 0.013) and tended to be higher in O (P = 0.068). HR increased only in OVER (P < 0.001), whereas HR did not change in any group (P = 0.248). A 16-week programme of HIIT improves O similarly in individuals training at intensities over or under their VTs. However, individuals training over their VTs showed a larger improvements in O expanding exercise workloads fuelled by oxidative metabolism.
本研究旨在探讨相对于通气阈值 (VT) 的训练强度是否决定了中年肥胖久坐个体心肺适能 (CRF) 的改善。在 16 周高强度间歇训练 (HIIT;70/90%HR 交替进行 43 分钟) 前后,通过递增式踏车运动试验评估了通气阈值 1 ( O HR)、通气阈值 2 ( O, HR) 和最大努力时的耗氧量 ( O) 和心率 (HR)。回顾性地,根据训练强度是否低于 (UNDER; n = 39) 或高于 (OVER; n = 37) VT 和 VT,将参与者分为两组。在基线时,两组的年龄、身体成分、 O O和 HR 相似。然而,OVER 组的 O更高 (P = 0.033),而 UNDER 组的 HR 和 HR 更高 (P < 0.05)。两组的 O (9.0%) 和 HR (2.2%) 均有相似的改善。两组的 O 和 O均随训练而改善 (P < 0.001),但 OVER 组的改善明显大于 UNDER 组 (P = 0.013),OVER 组的改善趋势更大 (P = 0.068)。仅 OVER 组的 HR 增加 (P < 0.001),而任何一组的 HR 均无变化 (P = 0.248)。16 周的 HIIT 方案可使训练强度高于或低于 VT 的个体的 O 得到相似的改善。然而,在高于 VT 训练的个体中, O 增加更大,扩大了氧化代谢供能的运动工作量。