Suppr超能文献

专家观点:同伴支持经历无家可归者:一项 Q 分类研究。

Expert viewpoints of peer support for people experiencing homelessness: A Q sort study.

机构信息

School of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2019 Aug;16(3):402-414. doi: 10.1037/ser0000258. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

Abstract

Peers have shared experiences of phenomena such as mental illness, addiction, and homelessness. Homelessness services are increasingly utilizing peers in their models to support people experiencing homelessness. While there is extensive literature on peer support in general, few studies focus on the potential change mechanisms that might underpin this intervention, particularly regarding homelessness. This study aims to utilize expert opinions to identify common viewpoints on components involved in effective peer support. Forty-three statements were developed from previous literature that broadly describes elements involved in peer support. Forty experts (20 peers and 20 professionals) ranked the statements into a hierarchy. Q methodology is a rigorous method to objectively research participants' subjective viewpoints, using a by-person rather than by-variable approach to factor analysis. The study was done in three stages: first-order analysis to identify shared viewpoints within (a) the peer participant group, (b) the professional participant group, and (c) a second-order analysis of Stage 1 and 2 results to identify common viewpoints held across participant groups. Stage 3 analysis resulted in three differing viewpoints; the dominant viewpoint asserts that effective peer support is rooted in experiential knowledge, where peers build unique, trusting relationships to provide clients with a different level of support. The results highlighted different types of peer support and defined a new one: a unidirectional, mentorship type of intentional peer support. Strengths and limitations are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

同行者具有精神疾病、成瘾和无家可归等现象的共同经历。无家可归服务机构越来越多地在其模式中利用同行者来支持无家可归者。虽然一般来说有大量关于同伴支持的文献,但很少有研究关注可能构成这种干预基础的潜在变化机制,特别是关于无家可归问题。本研究旨在利用专家意见来确定关于有效同伴支持所涉及的组成部分的共同观点。从先前的文献中广泛描述了同伴支持所涉及的元素,共制定了 43 个陈述。40 名专家(20 名同行者和 20 名专业人员)将这些陈述分为层次结构。Q 方法是一种严格的方法,可以客观地研究参与者的主观观点,使用按人而不是按变量的方法进行因素分析。该研究分三个阶段进行:首先对同行参与者群体(a)、专业参与者群体(b)和第二阶段对第一阶段和第二阶段结果的分析(c)进行分析,以确定参与者群体之间共同的观点。第三阶段的分析产生了三种不同的观点;主要观点认为,有效的同伴支持源于经验知识,同行者建立独特、信任的关系,为客户提供不同层次的支持。结果强调了不同类型的同伴支持,并定义了一种新的支持类型:单向、指导型的有意同伴支持。讨论了其优势和局限性。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验