Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 106 B, Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
Background Although pharmacotherapies are available for alcohol (EtOH) or tobacco use disorders individually, it may be possible to develop a single pharmacotherapy to treat heavy drinking tobacco smokers by capitalizing on the commonalities in their mechanisms of action. Methods Female alcohol-preferring (P) rats were trained for EtOH drinking and nicotine self-administration in two phases: (1) EtOH alone (0 vs. 15% EtOH, 2-bottle choice) and (2) concomitant access, during which EtOH access continued with access to nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/infusion, i.v.) using a 2-lever choice procedure (active vs. inactive lever) in which the fixed ratio (FR) requirement was gradually increased to FR30. When stable co-use was obtained, rats were pretreated with varying doses of naltrexone, varenicline, or r-bPiDI, an α6β2* subtype-selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist shown previously to reduce nicotine self-administration. Results While EtOH intake was initially suppressed in phase 2 (co-use), pharmacologically relevant intake for both substances was achieved by raising the "price" of nicotine to FR30. In phase 2, naltrexone decreased EtOH and water consumption but not nicotine intake; in contrast, naltrexone in phase 1 (EtOH only) did not significantly alter EtOH intake. Varenicline and r-bPiDI in phase 2 both decreased nicotine self-administration and inactive lever pressing, but neither altered EtOH or water consumption. Conclusions These results indicate that increasing the "price" of nicotine increases EtOH intake during co-use. Additionally, the efficacy of naltrexone, varenicline, and r-bPiDI was specific to either EtOH or nicotine, with no efficacy for co-use. Nevertheless, future studies on combining these treatments may reveal synergistic efficacy.
虽然有针对酒精(EtOH)或烟草使用障碍的药物治疗方法,但可以通过利用它们作用机制的共同点,开发一种单一的药物治疗方法来治疗重度饮酒和吸烟的人群。
雌性酒精偏好(P)大鼠在两个阶段接受 EtOH 饮酒和尼古丁自我给药训练:(1)单独 EtOH(0 与 15% EtOH,双瓶选择)和(2)同时给药,在此期间,EtOH 继续通过静脉内(i.v.)注射(0.03mg/kg/输注),使用 2 个杠杆选择程序(主动与不活跃杠杆),逐步增加固定比率(FR)要求至 FR30。当稳定的共用时,大鼠用不同剂量的纳曲酮、伐伦克林或 r-bPiDI 预处理,r-bPiDI 是一种先前显示可减少尼古丁自我给药的α6β2*亚型选择性烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体拮抗剂。
虽然 EtOH 摄入量在第 2 阶段(共使用)最初受到抑制,但通过将尼古丁的“价格”提高到 FR30,达到了两种物质的药理学相关摄入量。在第 2 阶段,纳曲酮减少了 EtOH 和水的消耗,但没有减少尼古丁的摄入;相比之下,第 1 阶段(仅 EtOH)的纳曲酮并没有显著改变 EtOH 的摄入量。第 2 阶段的伐伦克林和 r-bPiDI 都减少了尼古丁的自我给药和不活跃杠杆按压,但都没有改变 EtOH 或水的消耗。
这些结果表明,增加尼古丁的“价格”会增加共用时的 EtOH 摄入量。此外,纳曲酮、伐伦克林和 r-bPiDI 的疗效仅针对 EtOH 或尼古丁,对共用时没有疗效。然而,未来关于这些治疗方法结合的研究可能会揭示协同疗效。