American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2019 Mar;42(1):71-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278718809844. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
A major challenge with surveying physicians is low response. In this article, we present results of an experiment conducted to determine the optimal monetary incentive amount for gaining response from physicians to a short screener survey. Sampled physicians were randomly assigned to three prepaid cash incentive conditions (US$2, US$5, US$10) compared to a control (US$0). This study found using any incentive increased response versus no incentive. The US$10 incentive produced the highest response and was significantly greater than the US$2 incentive group. However, we did not find a statistical difference between the $5 and US$10 incentives or between the US$2 and US$5 incentives. In addition, any incentive amount increased the likelihood of early response compared to no incentive. This study builds on previously mixed results about the effects of various incentive amounts and effect on early survey response. These findings provide practical advice for researchers surveying physicians.
调查医生面临的一个主要挑战是低回应率。在本文中,我们介绍了一项旨在确定从医生那里获得简短筛查调查回应的最佳货币激励金额的实验结果。抽样医生被随机分配到三个预付现金激励条件(2 美元、5 美元、10 美元)与对照组(0 美元)进行比较。这项研究发现,与没有激励相比,任何激励都能提高回应率。10 美元的激励措施产生了最高的回应率,明显高于 2 美元的激励措施组。然而,我们没有发现 5 美元和 10 美元激励措施之间或 2 美元和 5 美元激励措施之间存在统计学差异。此外,与没有激励相比,任何激励金额都增加了早期回应的可能性。这项研究建立在先前关于各种激励金额的效果以及对早期调查回应的影响的混合结果的基础上。这些发现为调查医生的研究人员提供了实际建议。