Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology Unit, Section of Psychiatry School of Medicine Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Casa di Cura Alma Mater S.p.A. "Villa Camaldoli", Naples, Italy.
Pharmacol Res. 2019 Jan;139:494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
The re-emergence (i.e. 'breakthrough') of depressive symptoms despite maintenance treatment of depression with antidepressant drugs is a complex clinical phenomenon referred to as tolerance. Herein we critically appraise evidence from both pre-clinical and clinical studies, focusing on putative mechanisms as well as clinical correlates and implications of the emergence tolerance during antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). It is firstly unclear to what extent this phenotype reflects a pharmacological effect of an antidepressant, is driven by non-adherence, is a marker of latent bipolarity or another comorbidity, a marker of neuroprogression of the underlying disorder or the intrusion of the impact of psychosocial variables into the clinical course. The operational definitions of tolerance and its related phenomena have also been largely inconsistent. Several protective clinical indicators have been proposed, including a rapid-cycling course and comorbid chronic anxiety, whilst poor treatment adherence, proneness to emotional blunting and sub-threshold bipolarity have been identified as possible correlates of tolerance to antidepressant treatment in MDD. Putative neurobiological underpinnings include adaptations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the serotonergic system. Due to the clinical and diagnostic challenges imposed by the emergence of tolerance to antidepressants, there is an urgent need for upcoming international guidelines to reach a consensus on operational definitions for this complex clinical phenomenon, thus enabling a more precise appreciation of the incidence and correlates of tolerance to antidepressants. Taken together, the present review underscores the need to cautiously weight benefits and risks prior to considering long-term antidepressant treatment for patients with MDD as tolerance may emerge in a subset of patients.
尽管使用抗抑郁药物维持治疗抑郁症,但抑郁症状再次出现(即“突破”)是一种复杂的临床现象,称为耐药性。在此,我们批判性地评估了来自临床前和临床研究的证据,重点关注假设的机制以及在抗抑郁药治疗重性抑郁障碍(MDD)期间出现耐药性的临床相关性和意义。首先,尚不清楚这种表型在多大程度上反映了抗抑郁药的药理学作用,是由不依从引起的,是潜在双相性的标志物还是另一种共病,是潜在疾病神经进展的标志物还是心理社会变量对临床病程的影响的入侵。耐药性及其相关现象的操作定义也在很大程度上不一致。已经提出了几种保护临床指标,包括快速循环病程和共患慢性焦虑症,而较差的治疗依从性、易感性情绪迟钝和阈下双相性被认为是 MDD 中对抗抑郁治疗耐药的可能相关因素。假设的神经生物学基础包括下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴和 5-羟色胺能系统的适应性变化。由于出现抗抑郁药耐药性给临床诊断带来了挑战,因此迫切需要即将出台的国际指南就这一复杂临床现象的操作定义达成共识,从而更精确地了解抗抑郁药耐药性的发生率和相关性。综上所述,本综述强调需要在考虑为 MDD 患者进行长期抗抑郁治疗之前,谨慎权衡利弊和风险,因为耐药性可能会在一部分患者中出现。