College of Nursing, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, 29208, SC, USA.
College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;173(3):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5012-7. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Adherence to endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer is a significant problem, especially in minority populations. Further, endocrine therapy reduces recurrence and thus mortality. However, little data are available on interventions to improve adherence. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of interventions, strategies, or approaches aimed to improve endocrine therapy adherence among women with breast cancer. A secondary aim was to determine if interventions had any cultural modifications.
Two of the authors examined articles published between 2006 and 2017 from a wide variety of databases using Covidence systematic review platform.
In total, 16 eligible studies met criteria for review including 4 randomized controlled trials, 4 retrospective studies, and 8 with various observational designs. Eligible studies used a broad range of definitions for adherence and measured adherence by self-report, medical records, claims data, and combinations of these. All used 80% medication possession ratio as a standard for adherence. Patient information/education was the most frequent intervention strategy but did not demonstrate a significant effect except in one study. Significant results were noted when education was combined with communication strategies.
Researchers need a standard definition for adherence and a reliable measure that is feasible to use in a variety of studies. While education may be a necessary component of an intervention, when used alone, it is not a sufficient approach to change behavior.
激素阳性乳腺癌患者对内分泌治疗的依从性是一个重大问题,尤其是在少数人群中。此外,内分泌治疗可降低复发率,从而降低死亡率。然而,关于改善依从性的干预措施的数据很少。作者进行了系统评价,以检查旨在提高乳腺癌女性内分泌治疗依从性的干预措施、策略或方法的影响。次要目的是确定干预措施是否进行了任何文化调整。
两位作者使用 Covidence 系统评价平台,从各种数据库中检查了 2006 年至 2017 年期间发表的文章。
共有 16 项符合标准的研究符合审查标准,包括 4 项随机对照试验、4 项回顾性研究和 8 项具有各种观察性设计的研究。合格研究使用了广泛的依从性定义,并通过自我报告、医疗记录、索赔数据和这些数据的组合来衡量依从性。所有研究均将 80%的药物占有比作为依从性的标准。患者信息/教育是最常见的干预策略,但除了一项研究外,没有显著效果。当教育与沟通策略相结合时,会产生显著的结果。
研究人员需要一个依从性的标准定义和一个可靠的测量方法,以便在各种研究中使用。虽然教育可能是干预的必要组成部分,但单独使用时,它并不是改变行为的充分方法。