Suppr超能文献

围产期情绪困扰女性及对伴侣关系不满意的女性分娩期间的疼痛管理与医疗干预:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Pain management and medical interventions during childbirth among perinatal distressed women and women dissatisfied in their partner relationship: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Jonsdottir Sigridur Sia, Steingrimsdottir Thora, Thome Marga, Oskarsson Guðmundur Kristjan, Lydsdottir Linda Bara, Olafsdottir Halldora, Sigurdsson Jon Fridrik, Swahnberg Katarina

机构信息

Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Stagneliusgatan 14b, 392 34 Kalmar, Sweden; School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Nordurslod 2, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.

Women's Clinic, Landspitali University Hospital, v/Hringbraut, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland; School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2019 Feb;69:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate possible associations between distress in pregnant women and their use of pain management and medical interventions. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of reported dissatisfaction in relationship with their partner, or weak social support.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Women were invited to participate while attending prenatal care at participating Icelandic health care centres. Birth outcome data were obtained from the hospitals where these women gave birth.

PARTICIPANTS

Women in this study participated in a research project where 2523 women were screened three times during pregnancy for anxiety and depression. Women who had positive results at screening were invited to a semi-structured interview during pregnancy as well as every fourth woman who had negative results. Five hundred and sixty-two women participated in the interviews and the final sample was 442 women.

MEASUREMENTS

Distress was defined as symptoms of anxiety, stress and depression. The Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) were used for screening purposes. During the interview, the women answered the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Adverse Experienced Interview (AEI). The main outcome variables that were obtained from the women's childbirth records were: (1) use of pain management, categorized as: epidural analgesia, non-pharmacological pain management, nitrous oxide, pharmacological medication, or no pain management; (2) medical interventions categorized as: induction, stimulation, and episiotomy; and (3) mode of childbirth. A logistic regression analysis, adjusted for significant covariates, was conducted.

FINDINGS

A significant association was found between perinatal distress at 16 weeks gestation and use of epidural as single pain management. Overall, distressed women were 2.6 times more likely than non-distressed women to use epidural as a single pain management. They were also less likely to go through childbirth without use of any pain management method. Women who were dissatisfied in their relationship were significantly more likely to undergo induction of childbirth, an episiotomy and/or a vacuum extraction than those who were satisfied in their relationship, regardless if they were distressed or not. No association was found between social support and the outcome variables.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Women with perinatal distress were more likely to use an epidural than non-distressed women. The use of an epidural might help them manage pain and uncertainties related to childbirth. Women who were dissatisfied in their partner relationship may be more likely to undergo induction of childbirth, episiotomy and/or vacuum extraction.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Midwives need to acknowledge the possible association of distress and use of an epidural during childbirth and screen for distress early in pregnancy. It is important to offer counselling and help during pregnancy for expectant parents who are distressed or dissatisfied in their relationship.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查孕妇的心理困扰与其疼痛管理及医疗干预措施使用之间可能存在的关联。此外,我们评估了报告的对伴侣关系不满意或社会支持薄弱的影响。

设计

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。

背景

邀请在参与研究的冰岛医疗保健中心接受产前护理的女性参与。分娩结局数据从这些女性分娩的医院获取。

参与者

本研究中的女性参与了一个研究项目,其中2523名女性在孕期接受了三次焦虑和抑郁筛查。筛查结果呈阳性的女性在孕期被邀请参加半结构化访谈,同时每四名筛查结果呈阴性的女性中也邀请一名参加。562名女性参与了访谈,最终样本为442名女性。

测量

心理困扰被定义为焦虑、压力和抑郁症状。使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS)进行筛查。在访谈中,女性回答了二元调整量表(DAS)、领悟社会支持多维量表(MSPSS)和不良经历访谈(AEI)。从女性分娩记录中获得的主要结局变量包括:(1)疼痛管理的使用情况,分为:硬膜外镇痛、非药物性疼痛管理、氧化亚氮、药物治疗或无疼痛管理;(2)医疗干预措施,分为:引产、刺激和会阴切开术;(3)分娩方式。进行了调整显著协变量的逻辑回归分析。

结果

发现妊娠16周时的围产期心理困扰与单独使用硬膜外作为疼痛管理之间存在显著关联。总体而言,心理困扰的女性单独使用硬膜外作为疼痛管理的可能性是非心理困扰女性的2.6倍。她们也不太可能在不使用任何疼痛管理方法的情况下分娩。对伴侣关系不满意的女性比关系满意的女性更有可能接受引产、会阴切开术和/或真空吸引术,无论她们是否有心理困扰。未发现社会支持与结局变量之间存在关联。

主要结论

围产期心理困扰的女性比非心理困扰的女性更有可能使用硬膜外麻醉。使用硬膜外麻醉可能有助于她们应对与分娩相关的疼痛和不确定性。对伴侣关系不满意的女性可能更有可能接受引产、会阴切开术和/或真空吸引术。

对实践的启示

助产士需要认识到心理困扰与分娩期间使用硬膜外麻醉之间可能存在的关联,并在孕期早期筛查心理困扰。对于在关系中感到困扰或不满意的准父母,在孕期提供咨询和帮助很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验