Sifakakis Iosif, Zinelis Spiros, Eliades George, Koletsi Despina, Eliades Theodore
a Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece.
b Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece.
J Orthod. 2018 Dec;45(4):269-274. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2018.1542266. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
The purpose of this study was to assess enamel gloss changes induced by orthodontic bracket bonding with a light-cured composite or a light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
The Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Laboratory study.
A total of twenty extracted upper human first premolars were included in this study and each tooth served as a control for itself. Their buccal surfaces were subjected to 60-angle gloss measurement (G%60) with a standardized and secure repeated analysis of the same site. After baseline evaluation, a bracket was bonded on the buccal surface of each tooth. Half of the specimens were bonded with acid-etching and a light-cured composite whereas the other half with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement without prior enamel conditioning. Gloss measurements were repeated after bracket debonding and removal of the composite/glass ionomer cement with an 18-fluted carbide bur. Gloss differences between the two measurement conditions (baseline and post-debonding) were analyzed through linear regression with standard errors derived using the bootstrap method. Level of significance was set at a < 0.05.
A statistically significant difference was detected between the tested groups for the outcome of interest. Teeth bonded with light-cured composite exhibited larger enamel gloss changes as compared to resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement (β = 0.74; 95% CIs: 0.10, 1.38; p = 0.02).
Bracket bonding with two common bonding protocols (acid-etching with a light-cured composite vs. no etching with resin reinforced glass-ionomer cement) and subsequently debonding and adhesive removal with an 18-fluted carbide bur induced enamel gloss changes.
本研究旨在评估使用光固化复合树脂或光固化树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀进行正畸托槽粘结所引起的釉质光泽度变化。
希腊雅典国立与卡波季斯特里亚大学牙科学院生物材料系。
实验室研究。
本研究共纳入20颗拔除的人类上颌第一前磨牙,每颗牙齿自身作为对照。对其颊面进行60°角光泽度测量(G%60),对同一部位进行标准化且可靠的重复分析。在基线评估后,在每颗牙齿的颊面粘结一个托槽。一半的标本用酸蚀和光固化复合树脂粘结,而另一半用未预先处理釉质的光固化树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀粘结。在托槽脱粘并用18刃硬质合金车针去除复合树脂/玻璃离子水门汀后,再次进行光泽度测量。通过线性回归分析两种测量条件(基线和脱粘后)之间的光泽度差异,并使用自助法得出标准误差。显著性水平设定为a < 0.05。
在测试组之间检测到了与感兴趣结果相关的统计学显著差异。与树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀相比,用光固化复合树脂粘结的牙齿釉质光泽度变化更大(β = 0.74;95%置信区间:0.10,1.38;p = 0.02)。
使用两种常见的粘结方案(酸蚀与光固化复合树脂粘结与未酸蚀与树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀粘结)进行托槽粘结,随后用18刃硬质合金车针脱粘和去除粘结剂会引起釉质光泽度变化。