Shafi Reem M A, Kung Simon, Johnson Emily K, Lapid Maria I, Rasmussen Keith G
SHAFI, KUNG, JOHNSON, LAPID, and RASMUSSEN: Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2018 Nov;24(6):410-415. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000346.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for depression, but the standard 2 to 3 times weekly treatment course results in a total treatment duration of >2 weeks. We explored the viability of decreasing treatment duration by using daily right unilateral ultrabrief (RULUB) ECT instead of standard bitemporal (BT) ECT.
This study involved a retrospective review of records of inpatients 18 to 64 years of age who were treated between 2012 and 2017 at a large tertiary ECT center. Lead placement/technique, treatment duration (days from first to last ECT), number of ECT treatments, and scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HamD-24) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way analysis of variance and t tests.
Of 214 patients, 112 started daily RULUB ECT (86 were completers and 26 were eventually switched to BT), and 83 started and completed BT ECT. Daily RULUB completers finished their course of ECT 6.5 days faster than those who received BT ECT (11.7 vs. 18.2 d, P<0.0001), while the number of ECT treatments did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (daily RULUB 8.6 treatments vs. BT 8.3 treatments, P=0.4402). There were no significant differences in the final PHQ-9 or HamD-24 depression scores between the 2 groups. One case of significant cognitive impairment was observed in the daily RULUB group.
Daily RULUB ECT compared with BT ECT allowed depression to be treated faster and with similar efficacy. Randomized controlled trials, which include the use of formal cognitive and physical side effect measures, are needed to further explore the viability of daily RULUB ECT.
电休克治疗(ECT)是治疗抑郁症的一种有效方法,但标准的每周2至3次治疗疗程导致总治疗时长超过2周。我们探讨了采用每日右侧单侧超短程(RULUB)ECT而非标准的双侧颞部(BT)ECT来缩短治疗时长的可行性。
本研究对2012年至2017年期间在一家大型三级ECT中心接受治疗的18至64岁住院患者的记录进行了回顾性分析。收集了电极放置/技术、治疗时长(从首次ECT到末次ECT的天数)、ECT治疗次数、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)评分以及汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HamD-24)评分。采用单因素方差分析和t检验进行统计分析。
214例患者中,112例开始接受每日RULUB ECT治疗(86例完成治疗,26例最终转为BT治疗),83例开始并完成BT ECT治疗。每日RULUB ECT治疗的完成者比接受BT ECT治疗的患者提前6.5天完成ECT疗程(11.7天对18.2天,P<0.0001),而两组之间的ECT治疗次数无显著差异(每日RULUB ECT为8.6次治疗,BT ECT为8.3次治疗,P=0.4402)。两组最终的PHQ-9或HamD-24抑郁评分无显著差异。在每日RULUB ECT组中观察到1例显著的认知障碍病例。
与BT ECT相比,每日RULUB ECT能更快地治疗抑郁症,且疗效相似。需要进行随机对照试验,包括使用正式的认知和身体副作用测量方法,以进一步探讨每日RULUB ECT的可行性。