Suppr超能文献

一种在非荧光透视三维标测系统引导下进行经房间隔穿刺的新技术。

A novel technique for performing transseptal puncture guided by a non-fluoroscopic 3D mapping system.

作者信息

Sawhney Vinit, Breitenstein Alexander, Watts Troy, Garcia Jason, Finlay Malcolm, Lowe Martin, Hunter Ross, Earley Mark J, Schilling Richard J, Sporton Simon, Dhinoja Mehul

机构信息

Department of Arrhythmia Services, The Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):4-12. doi: 10.1111/pace.13541. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transseptal puncture (TSP) is commonly performed under fluoroscopic guidance in left atrial ablation procedures. This exposes patients and healthcare professionals to deleterious ionizing radiation. We describe a novel technique for performing TSP non-fluoroscopically using a three-dimensional (3D) mapping system only. The safety and efficacy of this technique is compared to traditional fluoroscopy guided TSP.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study of patients undergoing TSP for left atrial ablation. Those undergoing TSP using 3D mapping system alone (nonfluoroscopy group) were compared to those undergoing fluoroscopic guided TSP (Fluoroscopy group). Clinical, procedural data and complications were analyzed from a prospective registry.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (32 TSPs) in the nonfluoroscopy (NF) group were compared to 14 patients (25 TSPs) in fluoroscopy (F) group. TSP success rates were similar across the groups (88% vs 96% in the NF and F groups, P = 0.97). In the NF group, there was one cardiac tamponade, two unsuccessful TSPs (previous cardiac surgery-required TOE guided TSP), and one patient required fluoroscopy on a background of CRTD device to avoid lead displacement. The mean fluoroscopy time and dose were significantly lower in the nonfluoroscopy group (0.75  ±  0.50 vs 5.32 ± 3.23 min, P  <  0.001; 92.5 ± 60.7 vs 394.3 ± 182.7 cGy/cm , P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that TSPs can be performed safely and effectively using this non-fluoroscopic novel technique in a select group of patients. Radiation exposure is reduced significantly without compromising patient safety. Larger studies are required to substantiate these results. Patients with cardiac implantable devices and previous cardiac surgery may pose a challenge to using this technique.

摘要

背景

在左心房消融手术中,经房间隔穿刺(TSP)通常在荧光透视引导下进行。这会使患者和医护人员暴露于有害的电离辐射中。我们描述了一种仅使用三维(3D)标测系统非荧光透视下进行TSP的新技术。将该技术的安全性和有效性与传统荧光透视引导下的TSP进行比较。

方法

对接受左心房消融TSP的患者进行回顾性单中心研究。将仅使用3D标测系统进行TSP的患者(非荧光透视组)与接受荧光透视引导TSP的患者(荧光透视组)进行比较。从前瞻性登记处分析临床、手术数据和并发症。

结果

非荧光透视(NF)组的20例患者(32次TSP)与荧光透视(F)组的14例患者(25次TSP)进行比较。两组的TSP成功率相似(NF组和F组分别为88%和96%,P = 0.97)。在NF组中,有1例心脏压塞,2次TSP未成功(既往心脏手术,需经食管超声心动图引导TSP),1例患者在CRTD装置背景下需要荧光透视以避免导线移位。非荧光透视组的平均荧光透视时间和剂量显著更低(0.75±0.50 vs 5.32±3.23分钟, P < 0.001;92.5±60.7 vs 394.3±182.7 cGy/cm, P < 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在特定患者群体中,使用这种非荧光透视新技术可以安全有效地进行TSP。在不影响患者安全的情况下,辐射暴露显著降低。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。心脏植入式设备患者和既往心脏手术患者使用该技术可能具有挑战性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验