Danilyants Natalya, MacKoul Paul, Baxi Rupen, van der Does Louise Q, Haworth Leah R
The Center for Innovative GYN Care, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Feb;45(2):389-398. doi: 10.1111/jog.13853. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
By evaluating operative outcomes relative to cost, we compared the value of minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches, including a technique discussed less often in the literature, laparoscopic retroperitoneal hysterectomy (LRH), which incorporates retroperitoneal dissection and ligation of the uterine arteries at their vascular origin.
Retrospective chart review of all women (N = 2689) aged greater than or equal to 18 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2011 to 2013 at a high-volume hospital in Maryland, USA. Procedures included: laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), and LRH.
Total vaginal hysterectomy had the highest intraoperative complication rate (9.6%; P < 0.0001) but the lowest postoperative complication rate (1.8%; P < 0.0001). Robotics had the highest postoperative complication rate (11.4%; P < 0.0001). LRH had the shortest operative time (71.2 min; P < 0.0001) and the lowest intraoperative complication rates (2.1%; P < 0.0001). LRH and TVH were the least costly (averaging $4061 and $6416, respectively), while RALH was the most costly ($9354). Taking both operative outcomes and cost into account, LRH, TVH and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy yielded the highest value scores; total laparoscopic hysterectomy, RALH, and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy yielded the lowest.
Understanding the value of surgical interventions requires an evaluation of both operative outcomes and direct hospital costs. Using a quality-cost framework, the LRH approach as performed by high-volume laparoscopic specialists emerged as having the highest calculated value.
通过评估手术结果与成本的关系,我们比较了微创子宫切除术方法的价值,包括一种在文献中较少讨论的技术,即腹腔镜腹膜后子宫切除术(LRH),该技术包括腹膜后解剖和在子宫动脉血管起源处进行结扎。
对2011年至2013年在美国马里兰州一家大型医院因良性疾病接受子宫切除术的所有年龄大于或等于18岁的女性(N = 2689)进行回顾性病历审查。手术包括:腹腔镜次全子宫切除术、机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术(RALH)、全腹腔镜子宫切除术、腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术、全阴道子宫切除术(TVH)和LRH。
全阴道子宫切除术的术中并发症发生率最高(9.6%;P < 0.0001),但术后并发症发生率最低(1.8%;P < 0.0001)。机器人手术的术后并发症发生率最高(11.4%;P < 0.0001)。LRH的手术时间最短(71.2分钟;P < 0.0001),术中并发症发生率最低(2.1%;P < 0.0001)。LRH和TVH成本最低(分别平均为4061美元和6416美元),而RALH成本最高(9354美元)。综合考虑手术结果和成本,LRH、TVH和腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的价值得分最高;全腹腔镜子宫切除术、RALH和腹腔镜次全子宫切除术的价值得分最低。
了解手术干预的价值需要评估手术结果和直接的医院成本。使用质量-成本框架,由大量腹腔镜专家实施的LRH方法计算得出的价值最高。