1 Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Canada.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Mar;8(2):130-141. doi: 10.1177/2048872618799748. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
: There is uncertainty about the incidence of and prognosis associated with atrial fibrillation that is documented for the first time in the setting of an acute stressor, such as surgery or medical illness. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the incidence and long-term recurrence rates for atrial fibrillation occurring transiently with stress in the setting of acute medical illness.
: Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central to September 2017.
: We included retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomised controlled trials. The population of interest included patients hospitalised for medical (i.e. non-surgical) illness who developed newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Studies were included if they included data on either the incidence of atrial fibrillation or the rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence in atrial fibrillation occurring transiently with stress patients following hospital discharge.
: Two reviewers collected data independently and in duplicate. We characterised each study's methodology for ascertainment of prior atrial fibrillation history, atrial fibrillation during hospitalisation and atrial fibrillation recurrence after hospital discharge.
: Thirty-six studies reported the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Ten used a prospective design and included a period of continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Atrial fibrillation incidence ranged from 1% to 44%, which was too heterogeneous to justify meta-analysis ( I=99%). In post-hoc meta-regression models, the use of continuous ECG monitoring explained 13% of the variance in atrial fibrillation incidence, while care in an intensive care unit explained none. Two studies reported the long-term rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence following atrial fibrillation occurring transiently with stress. Neither of these studies used prospective, systematic monitoring. Recurrence rates at 5 years ranged from 42% to 68%.
: The incidence of atrial fibrillation with medical illness may be as high as 44%, with higher estimates in reports using continuous ECG monitoring. Within 5 years following hospital discharge, atrial fibrillation recurrence is documented in approximately half of patients; however, the true rate may be higher.
PROSPERO CRD42016043240.
在急性应激因素(如手术或内科疾病)下首次记录到的心房颤动的发生率和预后存在不确定性。我们的目的是对内科疾病急性发作时应激引起的短暂性心房颤动的发生率和长期复发率进行系统评价。
Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 至 2017 年 9 月。
我们纳入了回顾性和前瞻性观察性研究以及随机对照试验。感兴趣的人群包括因内科(即非外科)疾病住院并新发诊断为心房颤动的患者。如果研究包括以下数据,则将其纳入:在应激引起的短暂性心房颤动患者出院后,心房颤动的发生率或心房颤动复发率。
两名评审员独立重复收集数据。我们描述了每个研究确定既往心房颤动史、住院期间心房颤动和出院后心房颤动复发的方法。
36 项研究报告了心房颤动的发生率。10 项研究采用前瞻性设计,并包括连续心电图(ECG)监测期。心房颤动的发生率为 1%至 44%,差异太大,无法进行荟萃分析(I=99%)。在事后meta回归模型中,连续 ECG 监测的使用解释了心房颤动发生率差异的 13%,而在重症监护病房的护理则无解释。两项研究报告了应激引起的短暂性心房颤动后心房颤动复发的长期复发率。这两项研究均未采用前瞻性、系统性监测。5 年时的复发率为 42%至 68%。
内科疾病并发心房颤动的发生率可能高达 44%,而使用连续 ECG 监测的报告中发生率更高。在出院后 5 年内,约有一半的患者出现心房颤动复发;然而,实际发生率可能更高。
PROSPERO CRD42016043240。