1 Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, MC-28, New York, NY 10032.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jan;212(1):166-172. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19655. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
The objective of our study was to compare anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) morphology in symptomatic hips with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and in asymptomatic hips, determine the prevalence of impingement morphology in patients with a radiographic "crossover" sign, and identify potential risk factors for having impingement morphology.
For this retrospective study, we identified consecutive symptomatic hips with FAI (n = 54) and asymptomatic hips (n = 35) in patients who underwent CT from 2015 to 2017. Two radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 3D CT images of each hip and graded the AIIS morphology according to the Hetsroni classification scheme. The prevalence of AIIS morphology types was calculated. Associations of AIIS morphology types with symptoms and the crossover sign were evaluated with a chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression determined risk factors for abnormal AIIS morphology (i.e., type 2 or 3).
There was no difference in the prevalence of AIIS morphology types for symptomatic hips with FAI versus asymptomatic hips (p = 0.44) or for hips with a positive versus those with a negative crossover sign (p = 0.21). There was moderate interobserver agreement (κ = 0.44) and good-to-excellent intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.67 and 0.90) for grading AIIS morphology. Age, sex, femoral version, acetabular version, alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, and the crossover sign were not significant risk factors for abnormal AIIS morphology in patients with FAI (p = 0.11-0.79).
There is no difference in AIIS morphology between symptomatic hips with FAI versus asymptomatic hips or between hips with and those without the radiographic crossover sign. Age, sex, and other FAI parameters are not risk factors for developing AIIS impingement morphology.
本研究旨在比较患有股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)的症状性髋部和无症状髋部的前下髂嵴(AIIS)形态,确定影像学“交叉”征患者中撞击形态的发生率,并确定撞击形态的潜在危险因素。
这项回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年至 2017 年间接受 CT 检查的连续患有 FAI 的症状性髋部(n=54)和无症状髋部(n=35)患者。两位放射科医生盲法且独立地评估了每位髋部的 3D CT 图像,并根据 Hetsroni 分类方案对 AIIS 形态进行分级。计算 AIIS 形态类型的发生率。采用卡方检验评估 AIIS 形态类型与症状和交叉征的相关性。多变量逻辑回归确定异常 AIIS 形态(即 2 型或 3 型)的危险因素。
FAI 症状性髋部与无症状髋部的 AIIS 形态类型发生率无差异(p=0.44),或阳性交叉征与阴性交叉征髋部的 AIIS 形态类型发生率无差异(p=0.21)。分级 AIIS 形态的观察者间一致性中等(κ=0.44),观察者内一致性良好至极好(κ=0.67 和 0.90)。年龄、性别、股骨前倾角、髋臼前倾角、α 角、外侧中心边缘角和交叉征不是 FAI 患者异常 AIIS 形态的显著危险因素(p=0.11-0.79)。
FAI 症状性髋部与无症状髋部或有和无影像学交叉征髋部的 AIIS 形态无差异。年龄、性别和其他 FAI 参数不是发生 AIIS 撞击形态的危险因素。