Murdoch Maureen, Partin Melissa Ruth, Vang Derek, Kehle-Forbes Shannon Marie
1 Minneapolis VA Health Care System, MN, USA.
2 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Feb;14(1):15-22. doi: 10.1177/1556264618810302. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
It is difficult to apply U.S. Federal Code of Regulation's criterion for "minimal risk," because benchmarks of minimal risk have not been quantified. Our goal was to examine the psychological risks of several day-to-day activities. Using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), we assessed the state valence and arousal of 432 patients and employees at a large Midwestern Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility before and after they had their blood drawn, saw their primary care physician or mental health provider, or took part in an exercise class. Exercise was associated with near-large to large salutary effects (Cohen's d = 0.76-1.17); other effects were small or moderate in positive directions (Cohen's d = 0.02-0.51). Our findings are a promising start toward establishing benchmarks and quantifying the psychological harms of minimal risk activities. Estimates such as these may help researchers determine whether their own research exceeds minimal risk.
很难应用美国联邦法规中关于“最低风险”的标准,因为最低风险的基准尚未量化。我们的目标是研究几项日常活动的心理风险。我们使用自我评估人体模型(SAM),在中西部一家大型退伍军人事务部医疗设施的432名患者和员工抽血、看初级保健医生或心理健康服务提供者或参加健身课程之前和之后,评估他们的状态效价和唤醒水平。锻炼与近乎较大到较大的有益效果相关(科恩d值=0.76-1.17);其他效果在正向方向上较小或中等(科恩d值=0.02-0.51)。我们的研究结果是朝着建立基准和量化最低风险活动的心理危害迈出的一个有希望的开端。这样的估计可能有助于研究人员确定他们自己的研究是否超过了最低风险。