a Department of Hand Surgery , Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University , Shijiazhuang , Hebei , China.
b Dept. of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine , University of Kentucky , Lexington , KY , USA.
Phys Sportsmed. 2019 May;47(2):189-198. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1546106. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
The objective of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03031015) is to compare the treatments of hand proximal phalanx shaft fractures with external-fixation technique using the combination of K-wires and bone-cement vs. open reduction and internal fixation technique using a miniature plate-and-screw system.
A total of 107 patients (134 cases) were randomly allocated to group A (67 cases in 56 patients) and B (64 cases in 51 patients). Fingers in group A were treated with bone-cement K-wire fixation, and fingers in group B were treated using a plate-and-screw system.
Follow-ups lasted 2 years. In group A, active range of motion of proximal interphalangeal joint reached 93% ± 6.7% of the opposite fingers. In group B, the data reached 86% ± 14.4% of the opposite fingers. Based on total active motion scoring system, we obtained 21 excellent and 46 good results in group A; and 9 excellent, 50 good, and 5 fair results in group B. There was a significant difference with regards to the function of the fingers (p < 0.05).
The bone-cement K-wire fixation may be another option for the treatment of shaft fractures of proximal phalanges. The minimally invasive technique allows early joint motion, resulting in minimal complications and good functional recovery.
本研究(ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03031015)旨在比较使用 K 型钉和骨水泥联合外固定技术与使用微型钢板螺钉系统的切开复位内固定技术治疗手部近节指骨干骨折的疗效。
共纳入 107 例(134 指)患者,随机分为 A 组(56 例 67 指)和 B 组(51 例 64 指)。A 组采用骨水泥 K 型钉固定,B 组采用钢板螺钉系统治疗。
随访时间为 2 年。A 组近节指间关节主动活动度达健指的 93%±6.7%,B 组达健指的 86%±14.4%。按总主动活动度评分系统,A 组优 21 指,良 46 指;B 组优 9 指,良 50 指,可 5 指。两组手指功能比较差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
骨水泥 K 型钉固定可作为近节指骨干骨折的另一种治疗选择。微创技术可早期进行关节活动,并发症少,功能恢复良好。